Literature DB >> 31290026

Decreased tibial nerve movement in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and persistent leg pain.

G Shum1,2, S Cinnamond3, M Hutton4, D Chan4, R Chauhan4, S Bloxham3, S Choy3, R Cheung5, S Eldabe6, A Clarke4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure and compare the total and normalised tibial nerve movements during forward bending in patients with and without failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) and persistent leg pain following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery and demonstrated no psychological stress. Nerve pathomechanics may contribute to FBSS with persistent leg pain following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery.
METHODS: Tibial nerve movement during forward bending was measured in two groups of patients following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery. FBSS group (N = 37) consisted of patients with persistent leg pain following lumbar surgery, and non-FBSS (N = 37) were patients with no remaining leg pain following lumbar surgery. Total and normalised tibial nerve movement at the popliteal fossa was measured by a previously validated ultrasound imaging technique and compared between the two groups, and also between the painful and non-painful leg within the FBSS group.
RESULTS: Both the mean total and normalised tibial nerve movement were significantly decreased in the FBSS group in both legs when compared to the non-FBSS group (P < 0.05). The total and normalised tibial nerve movements were also more restricted in the painful leg (P < 0.05) when compared to the non-painful side within the FBSS group.
CONCLUSION: This was the first study to quantify the decreased total and normalised tibial nerve mobility in FBSS patients with persistent leg pain when compared with non-FBSS patients following anatomically successful lumbar decompression surgery. Further research could investigate the efficacy of intervention, such as nerve mobilisation in this particular group of patients with failed back surgery syndrome and limited nerve mobility. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Failed back surgery syndrome; Nerve movement; Neuropathic pain; Post-operative pain; Sciatica

Year:  2019        PMID: 31290026     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06056-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  25 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the passive straight leg raising test as a diagnostic aid for low back pain (1989 to 2000).

Authors:  Richard Rebain; G David Baxter; Suzanne McDonough
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mark P Jensen; Nathaniel P Katz; Robert D Kerns; Gerold Stucki; Robert R Allen; Nicholas Bellamy; Daniel B Carr; Julie Chandler; Penney Cowan; Raymond Dionne; Bradley S Galer; Sharon Hertz; Alejandro R Jadad; Lynn D Kramer; Donald C Manning; Susan Martin; Cynthia G McCormick; Michael P McDermott; Patrick McGrath; Steve Quessy; Bob A Rappaport; Wendye Robbins; James P Robinson; Margaret Rothman; Mike A Royal; Lee Simon; Joseph W Stauffer; Wendy Stein; Jane Tollett; Joachim Wernicke; James Witter
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 3.  The gliding apparatus of peripheral nerve and its clinical significance.

Authors:  H Millesi; G Zöch; T Rath
Journal:  Ann Chir Main Memb Super       Date:  1990

4.  Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Samo K Fokter; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The distress and risk assessment method (DRAM).

Authors:  J L Hobby; L N Lutchman; J M Powell; D J Sharp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-01

6.  Effect of low back pain on the kinematics and joint coordination of the lumbar spine and hip during sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit.

Authors:  Gary L K Shum; Jack Crosbie; Raymond Y W Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm?

Authors:  Harold L Asch; P Jeffrey Lewis; Douglas B Moreland; James G Egnatchik; Young J Yu; David E Clabeaux; Andrew H Hyland
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Rates of advanced spinal imaging and spine surgery.

Authors:  Jon D Lurie; Nancy J Birkmeyer; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy in a young, active population: correlation by herniation type and level.

Authors:  Christopher B Dewing; Matthew T Provencher; Robert H Riffenburgh; Stewart Kerr; Richard E Manos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Pressure and stretch mechanosensitivity of peripheral nerve fibres following local inflammation of the nerve trunk.

Authors:  Andrew Dilley; Bruce Lynn; See Jye Pang
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.