Literature DB >> 16366798

Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: a consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search?

Jane E Raymond1, Mark J Fenske, Nikki Westoby.   

Abstract

Visual search has been studied extensively, yet little is known about how its constituent processes affect subsequent emotional evaluation of searched-for and searched-through items. In 3 experiments, the authors asked observers to locate a colored pattern or tinted face in an array of other patterns or faces. Shortly thereafter, either the target or a distractor was rated on an emotional scale (patterns, cheerfulness; faces, trustworthiness). In general, distractors were rated more negatively than targets. Moreover, distractors presented near the target during search were rated significantly more negatively than those presented far from the target. Target-distractor proximity affected distractor ratings following both simple-feature and difficult-conjunction search, even when items appeared at different locations during evaluation than during search and when faces previously tinted during search were presented in grayscale at evaluation. An attentional inhibition account is offered to explain these effects of attention on emotional evaluation. (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16366798     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory.

Authors:  Brian A Goolsby; Kimron L Shapiro; Jane E Raymond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

2.  Response inhibition results in the emotional devaluation of faces: neural correlates as revealed by fMRI.

Authors:  Sonia Doallo; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Monika Kiss; Martin Eimer; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Less approach, more avoidance: Response inhibition has motivational consequences for sexual stimuli that reflect changes in affective value not a lingering global brake on behavior.

Authors:  Rachel L Driscoll; Keelia Quinn de Launay; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Selective attention to real-world objects drives their emotional appraisal.

Authors:  Nathan J Wispinski; Shihao Lin; James T Enns; Craig S Chapman
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Interrelated and interdependent.

Authors:  Adele Diamond
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2007-01

6.  Cognitive-behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of the affective consequences of ignoring stimulus representations in working memory.

Authors:  David De Vito; Anne E Ferrey; Mark J Fenske; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Cognition-emotion interactions are modulated by working memory capacity in individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Bern G Lee; James A Waltz; Benjamin M Robinson; Jaime K Brown; James M Gold
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-09-08       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Attentional modulation of emotional conflict processing with flanker tasks.

Authors:  Pingyan Zhou; Xun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Brian A Goolsby; Jane E Raymond; Kimron L Shapiro; Laetitia Silvert; Anna C Nobre; Nickolaos Fragopanagos; John G Taylor; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Emotions and personality traits as high-level factors in visual attention: a review.

Authors:  Kai Kaspar; Peter König
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.