Literature DB >> 16362136

[Biomechanical aspects of revision components for knee arthroplasty].

E Steinhauser1, R Burgkart, L Gerdesmeyer.   

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most frequent orthopaedic surgical procedures. Despite continuous improvements in the endoprostheses, instruments, and operative techniques, revision TKA has a rate of about 10% of overall TKA. In addition to the restoration of the periprosthetic bone stock and a precise alignment, the choice of an adequate implant, which meets the patient's specific requirements, has high impact on the outcome. The most significant differences between implants involve the degree of reconstructed joint area (uni-, bi-, tri-compartimental) and the order of the constraining forces between the femoral and tibial component. Implants for revision TKA commonly range from un- or semiconstrained resurfacing implants to fully constrained hinged endoprostheses. In case of severe osseous, ligamentous, and/or muscular defects, special tumor endoprostheses or implants for arthrodesis might be an alternative option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16362136     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0911-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  17 in total

1.  [Navigation in knee endoprosthesis implantation--preliminary experiences and prospective comparative study with conventional implantation technique].

Authors:  R K Mielke; U Clemens; J H Jens; S Kershally
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.

Authors:  Ake Carlsson; Anders Björkman; Jack Besjakov; Ingemar Onsten
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Surface-gradient cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cups: oxidation resistance and wear against smooth and rough femoral balls.

Authors:  Fu-Wen Shen; Harry McKellop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Influence of the remelting process on the fatigue behavior of electron beam irradiated UHMWPE.

Authors:  J A Puértolas; F J Medel; J Cegoñino; E Gomez-Barrena; R Ríos
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emilios E Pakos; Evangelia E Ntzani; Thomas A Trikalinos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

Review 7.  Knee arthoplasty: recently developed ceramics offer new solutions.

Authors:  Günther Heimke; Stefan Leyen; Gerd Willmann
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Biomechanical and allergological characteristics of a biodegradable poly(D,L-lactic acid) coating for orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  Hans Gollwitzer; Peter Thomas; Peter Diehl; Erwin Steinhauser; Burkard Summer; Sonja Barnstorf; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Wolfram Mittelmeier; Axel Stemberger
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  [Patellar resurfacing. Results of a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  H Schroeder-Boersch; G Scheller; M Synnatschke; P Arnold; L Jani
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand; M B Coventry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  [The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; A Töpfer; J Kircher; H Grundei; P Diehl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [The modular endoprosthetic system Munich-Luebeck (MML): potential applications and results in the lower extremities].

Authors:  G von Salis-Soglio; M Ghanem; I Meinecke; M Ellenrieder; H-M Klinger; C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Knee arthroplasty revision].

Authors:  H-P Scharf; A Schulze
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.