Literature DB >> 16897030

[The modular MML revision system in knee revision and tumor arthroplasty].

L Gerdesmeyer1, A Töpfer, J Kircher, H Grundei, P Diehl.   

Abstract

Increasing age and a higher level of mobility lead to an increasing incidence in revision arthroplasty after total knee replacement and tumor surgery. So far, the reconstruction of large defects in bony and soft tissue environments can be accomplished by the modern modular components of revision implants. The consecutive reconstruction of the extensor mechanism in extended revision has its own drawbacks and is often associated with significant functional limitations for the patient. Specially designed implants and methods are required to generate good functional results. The modular knee revision system MML provides specific modifications of the tibial component for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. Combined with artificial strips, an excellent functional outcome could be achieved. In this study, 70 patients were operated with the MML endoprosthesis in knee revision or tumor surgery. An excellent functional outcome could be determined. At 7 years after surgery, an average of 32+/-13 points was achieved on the Oxford Knee Score. The outcome measurement using the functional scoring system of the American Knee Society (AKS score) showed similarly good results with 71+/-25 points out of 100. A minor deficit of only 2 degrees in active extension could be observed after reconstruction of the extensor mechanism. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the MML modular revision system is appropriate for reconstruction of segmental bone defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16897030     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0982-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  42 in total

1.  Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is enough?

Authors:  G R Scuderi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  [Modular revision systems in total knee arthroplasty. Possibilities and techniques].

Authors:  R Hube; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Reoperations after 3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Rafael J Sierra; William P Cooney; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; James A Rand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Disengagement of a locking screw from a modular stem in revision total knee arthroplasty. A report of three cases.

Authors:  G H Westrich; C Hidaka; R E Windsor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Medial gastrocnemius transposition flap for the treatment of disruption of the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J W Jaureguito; C M Dubois; S R Smith; L J Gottlieb; H A Finn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Muscle function after endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia. Different techniques for extensor reconstruction in 17 tumor patients.

Authors:  R Petschnig; R Baron; R Kotz; P Ritschl; A Engel
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1995-06

Review 8.  Extensor mechanism failure associated with total knee arthroplasty: prevention and management.

Authors:  David A Parker; Michael J Dunbar; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems.

Authors:  Raymond Y L Liow; Karen Walker; Mohammad A Wajid; Gurinder Bedi; Catherine M E Lennox
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Total knee arthroplasty using the kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis.

Authors:  J A Shaw; W Balcom; R B Greer
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Proximal tibial replacement and alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after bone tumor resection].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; H Pilge; A Toepfer; R G Jakubietz; H Gollwitzer; H Rechl; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; M Rudert
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  [The modular endoprosthetic system Munich-Luebeck (MML): potential applications and results in the lower extremities].

Authors:  G von Salis-Soglio; M Ghanem; I Meinecke; M Ellenrieder; H-M Klinger; C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Alloplastic reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after resection of tibial sarcoma.

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Hans Rechl; Stefan Lehner; Hakan Pilge; Hans Gollwitzer; Erwin Steinhauser
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2011-04-11

4.  Periprosthetic joint infections in modular endoprostheses of the lower extremities: a retrospective observational study in 101 patients.

Authors:  Dirk Zajonz; Almut Zieme; Torsten Prietzel; Michael Moche; Solveig Tiepoldt; Andreas Roth; Christoph Josten; Georg Freiherr von Salis-Soglio; Christoph-E Heyde; Mohamed Ghanem
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2016-02-09

5.  Distal femoral replacement with the MML system: a single center experience with an average follow-up of 86 months.

Authors:  Andreas Toepfer; Norbert Harrasser; Paul-Ruben Schwarz; Florian Pohlig; Ulrich Lenze; Heinrich M L Mühlhofer; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Christian Suren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Short- to long-term follow-up of total femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients.

Authors:  Andreas Toepfer; Norbert Harrasser; Isabel Petzschner; Florian Pohlig; Ulrich Lenze; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Dominik Pförringer; Marcel Toepfer; Marc Beirer; Moritz Crönlein; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Heinz Mühlhofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Is total femoral replacement for non-oncologic and oncologic indications a safe procedure in limb preservation surgery? A single center experience of 22 cases.

Authors:  Andreas Toepfer; Norbert Harrasser; Isabel Petzschner; Florian Pohlig; Ulrich Lenze; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Heinrich Mühlhofer; Christian Suren
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 2.175

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.