Literature DB >> 20186382

[Knee arthroplasty revision].

H-P Scharf1, A Schulze.   

Abstract

The number of knee arthroplasties in Germany increases about 6.8% annually. Parallel to the increasing number of primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) the frequency of TKA revision surgery also goes up and is a growing challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The main reason for revision arthroplasty is aseptic or septic mechanical loosening of the implant. Other reasons are persisting pain, instability or limited range of motion. The aim of preoperative evaluation by examination, x-ray control and serum tests is to understand the mechanism of implant failure. Besides the stable mechanical fixation of the new implant, reconstruction of limb alignment, joint line and balanced extension and flexion gaps must be achieved. Bone defects also need to be reconstructed. Modular revision implants and bone grafts support the surgeon in restoring a pain-free knee function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186382     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1843-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  10 in total

1.  The patellofemoral joint in total knee arthroplasty: is the design of the trochlea the critical factor?

Authors:  S K Kulkarni; M A Freeman; J C Poal-Manresa; J I Asencio; J J Rodriguez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  [Axial correction in knee revision arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Perka; S Tohtz; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Biomechanical aspects of revision components for knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  E Steinhauser; R Burgkart; L Gerdesmeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Quality of life after knee revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  David J Deehan; James D Murray; Paul D Birdsall; Ian M Pinder
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J N Insall; R Binazzi; M Soudry; L A Mestriner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Management of bone loss: structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Allan Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Knee endoprosthesis: clinical aspects].

Authors:  C Stukenborg-Colsman; C J Wirth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs.

Authors:  Pirjo Räsänen; Pekka Paavolainen; Harri Sintonen; Anna-Maija Koivisto; Marja Blom; Olli-Pekka Ryynänen; Risto P Roine
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction in aseptic and septic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Wang; Ming-Chun Hsieh; Ting-Wen Huang; Jun-Wen Wang; Han-Shiang Chen; Chen-Yeo Liu
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Very rare cases of periprosthetic malignant neoplasms : Data from 4000 cases of endoprosthetic joint replacements from the histopathologic implant register].

Authors:  Kevin Keidel; Marc Thomsen; Christian Dierkes; Holger Haas; Ingo Arnold; Karl-Dieter Heller; Vincent Krenn; Martin Liebisch; Mike Otto; Thorsten Gehrke; Veit Krenn
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.