Literature DB >> 15161378

Lexical influences in audiovisual speech perception.

Lawrence Brancazio1, Lawrence Brancazio1.   

Abstract

Phoneme identification with audiovisually discrepant stimuli is influenced hy information in the visual signal (the McGurk effect). Additionally, lexical status affects identification of auditorily presented phonemes. The present study tested for lexical influences on the McGurk effect. Participants identified phonemes in audiovisually discrepant stimuli in which lexical status of the auditory component and of a visually influenced percept was independently varied. Visually influenced (McGurk) responses were more frequent when they formed a word and when the auditory signal was a nonword (Experiment 1). Lexical effects were larger for slow than for fast responses (Experiment 2), as with auditory speech, and were replicated with stimuli matched on physical properties (Experiment 3). These results are consistent with models in which lexical processing of speech is modality independent. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15161378     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  24 in total

1.  Can you McGurk yourself? Self-face and self-voice in audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Christopher Aruffo; David I Shore
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-02

2.  Neural correlates of audiotactile phonetic processing in early-blind readers: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Morteza Pishnamazi; Yasaman Nojaba; Habib Ganjgahi; Asie Amousoltani; Mohammad Ali Oghabian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Children perceive speech onsets by ear and eye.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Nancy Tye-Murray; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2016-01-11

4.  Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Jerrold Lieblich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Assessing multimodal spoken word-in-sentence recognition in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Karen Iler Kirk; Marcia Hay-McCutcheon
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Audiovisual speech perception: A new approach and implications for clinical populations.

Authors:  Julia Irwin; Lori DiBlasi
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2017-03-26

7.  What you see isn't always what you get: Auditory word signals trump consciously perceived words in lexical access.

Authors:  Rachel Ostrand; Sheila E Blumstein; Victor S Ferreira; James L Morgan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-03-21

8.  Auditory-visual fusion in speech perception in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Efrat A Schorr; Nathan A Fox; Virginie van Wassenhove; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Functional activation for imitation of seen and heard speech.

Authors:  Julia R Irwin; Stephen J Frost; W Einar Mencl; Helen Chen; Carol A Fowler
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.710

10.  Visibility of speech articulation enhances auditory phonetic convergence.

Authors:  James W Dias; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.