Literature DB >> 16334054

Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search.

Carrick C Williams1, John M Henderson, Rose T Zacks.   

Abstract

We explored incidental retention of visual details of encountered objects during search. Participants searched for conjunction targets in 32 arrays of 12 pictures of real-world objects and then performed a token discrimination task that examined their memory for visual details of the targets and distractors from the search task. The results indicate that even though participants had not been instructed to memorize the objects, the visual details of search targets and distractor objects related to the targets were retained after the search. Distractor objects unrelated to the search target were remembered more poorly. Eye-movement measures indicated that the objects that were remembered were looked at more frequently during search than those that were not remembered. These results provide support that detailed visual information is included incidentally in the visual representation of an object after the object is no longer in view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16334054      PMCID: PMC1751468          DOI: 10.3758/bf03193535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  35 in total

1.  Search for multiple targets: remember the targets, forget the search.

Authors:  T S Horowitz; J M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-02

2.  Distractor ratio influences patterns of eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  J Shen; E M Reingold; M Pomplun
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Visual search has memory.

Authors:  M S Peterson; A F Kramer; R F Wang; D E Irwin; J S McCarley
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

4.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

5.  Change detection in the flicker paradigm: the role of fixation position within the scene.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; G Schrock; J M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

Review 6.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.

Authors:  J K O'Regan; A Noë
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

7.  Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

8.  Saccade target selection in visual search: the effect of information from the previous fixation.

Authors:  J M Findlay; V Brown; I D Gilchrist
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Nothing compares 2 views: change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitroff; Daniel J Simons; Daniel T Levin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

10.  Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Christopher F Chabris; Tatiana Schnur; Daniel T Levin
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2002-03
View more
  24 in total

1.  The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Katherine Sledge Moore; David B Drowos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

2.  Priorities for selection and representation in natural tasks.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Yoriko Hirose; Sarah K Finnegan; Riina Pievilainen; Clare Kirtley; Alan Kennedy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 4.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

5.  Meaning in learning: Contextual cueing relies on objects' visual features and not on objects' meaning.

Authors:  Tal Makovski
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-01

6.  Task-relevant perceptual features can define categories in visual memory too.

Authors:  Karla B Antonelli; Carrick C Williams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-11

7.  Using a Large-scale Neural Model of Cortical Object Processing to Investigate the Neural Substrate for Managing Multiple Items in Short-term Memory.

Authors:  Qin Liu; Antonio Ulloa; Barry Horwitz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

9.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Age doesn't matter much: hybrid visual and memory search is preserved in older adults.

Authors:  Iris Wiegand; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2019-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.