Literature DB >> 11883989

Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.

Daniel J Simons1, Christopher F Chabris, Tatiana Schnur, Daniel T Levin.   

Abstract

People often fail to detect large changes to scenes, provided that the changes occur during a visual disruption. This phenomenon, known as "change blindness," occurs both in the laboratory and in real-world situations in which changes occur unexpectedly. The pervasiveness of the inability to detect changes is consistent with the theoretical notion that we internally represent relatively little information from our visual world from one glance at a scene to the next. However, evidence for change blindness does not necessarily imply the absence of such a representation---people could also miss changes if they fail to compare an existing representation of the pre-change scene to the post-change scene. In three experiments, we show that people often do have a representation of some aspects of the pre-change scene even when they fail to report the change. And, in fact, they appear to "discover" this memory and can explicitly report details of a changed object in response to probing questions. The results of these real-world change detection studies are discussed in the context of broader claims about change blindness. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11883989     DOI: 10.1006/ccog.2001.0533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  16 in total

1.  Why don't we see changes?: The role of attentional bottlenecks and limited visual memory.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Andrea Reinecke; Peter Brawn
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2006

2.  The roles of encoding, retrieval, and awareness in change detection.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Matrhew S Peterson; Bonnie L Angelone
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

3.  Catastrophic individuation failures in infancy: A new model and predictions.

Authors:  Maayan Stavans; Yi Lin; Di Wu; Renée Baillargeon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; John M Henderson; Rose T Zacks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

5.  Task-specific modulation of memory for object features in natural scenes.

Authors:  Alan Robinson; Jochen Triesch
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-12-04

6.  Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object.

Authors:  Cheng-Ta Yang; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-01-30

7.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

Authors:  Joo-seok Hyun; Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Does consciousness overflow cognitive access? Novel insights from the new phenomenon of attribute amnesia.

Authors:  Yingtao Fu; Wenchen Yan; Mowei Shen; Hui Chen
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 6.038

9.  Detection of appearing and disappearing objects in complex acoustic scenes.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes Constantino; Leyla Pinggera; Supathum Paranamana; Makio Kashino; Maria Chait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Iconic memory requires attention.

Authors:  Marjan Persuh; Boris Genzer; Robert D Melara
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.