Literature DB >> 16330119

A simple technique for craniospinal radiotherapy in the supine position.

William A Parker1, Carolyn R Freeman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Craniospinal irradiation poses technical difficulties that may be addressed with the use of the newer technologies that have become available over the past decade. The use of CT simulation allows improved target localisation and beam geometry definition while significantly reducing the treatment simulation time. We have developed a CT-based technique for whole CNS irradiation in the supine position that uses fixed field parameters, asymmetric jaws for field matching and drastically reduces simulation and treatment times.
METHODS: The patient is CT scanned and treated in the supine position. The clinical target volume and relevant critical structures are outlined on a planning CT scan. Half beam blocked lateral fields with a collimator rotation are used to match the beam divergence from the superior border of the spinal field at the C2 vertebral body. The shielding for the cranial fields is generated automatically, and the dose distribution is calculated using a 3D treatment planning system. Fixed field parameters are used for the planning and treatment. The position of the isocenter of the spine field is always a fixed longitudinal distance from the isocenter of the brain fields. If multiple posterior fields are required, the isocenter of the second spine field is always a fixed longitudinal distance from that of the first and the gap between the fields is determined using virtual simulation and feathered during treatment using the asymmetric jaws of the linear accelerator. All treatment portals are filmed daily during the first week of treatment, and after each junction change thereafter. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The supine position provides numerous advantages. Patients are more comfortable, the treatment position is more reproducible, and access to the airway is possible, if necessary, for patient sedation. The use of CT simulation decreases the simulation time, allows for increased planning accuracy, and enables the use of multimodality image registration, and 3D treatment planning. The use of asymmetric jaws allows for junction feathering without changing the patient setup or using a couch angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16330119     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  15 in total

1.  High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy.

Authors:  D S Sharma; T Gupta; R Jalali; Z Master; R D Phurailatpam; R Sarin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in field junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT.

Authors:  Andrej Strojnik; Ignasi Méndez; Primož Peterlin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-03-28

3.  A novel supine isocentric approach for craniospinal irradiation and its clinical outcome.

Authors:  Yi-Kan Cheng; Lei Zeng; Shu-Biao Ye; Jian Zheng; Lin Zhang; Peng Sun; Xiao-Bo Jiang; Wen-Zhao Sun; Tao Xu; Lei Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Craniospinal radiotherapy in children: Electron- or photon-based technique of spinal irradiation.

Authors:  Marzanna Chojnacka; Anna Skowrońska-Gardas; Marzena Morawska-Kaczyńska; Anna Zygmuntowicz-Piętka; Katarzyna Pędziwiatr; Anna Semaniak
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-02-18

5.  A simple planning technique of craniospinal irradiation in the eclipse treatment planning system.

Authors:  Hemalatha Athiyaman; Athiyaman Mayilvaganan; Daleep Singh
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-10

6.  Designed-seamless irradiation technique for extended whole mediastinal proton-beam irradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Noriyuki Okonogi; Takatuki Hashimoto; Masaya Ishida; Toshiki Ohno; Toshiyuki Terunuma; Toshiyuki Okumura; Takeji Sakae; Hideyuki Sakurai
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  A simple approach of three-isocenter IMRT planning for craniospinal irradiation.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Wei Jiang; Yuanming Feng; Yang Guo; Zheng Cong; Bin Song; Yu Guo
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  A light-field-based method to adjust on-axis rounded leaf end MLC position to predict off-axis MLC penumbra region dosimetric performance in a radiation therapy planning system.

Authors:  Jia-Ming Wu; Tsair-Fwu Lee; Shyh-An Yeh; Kuan-Yin Hsiao; Hsin-Hsiung Chen; Pei-Ju Chao; Yi-Ting Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  A Simplified Supine Technique Expedites the Delivery of Effective Craniospinal Radiation to Medulloblastoma - Comparison with Other Techniques in the Literature.

Authors:  Patricia Tai; Rashmi Koul; Khanh Vu; Trent Edwards; Joseph Buwembo; Alisson R Teles; Muhammad Salim
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-12-15

10.  Acute toxicity profile of craniospinal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in children with medulloblastoma: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Maurice C Cox; Johannes M Kusters; Corrie E Gidding; Jolanda H Schieving; Erik J van Lindert; Johannes H Kaanders; Geert O Janssens
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.