| Literature DB >> 26819866 |
Patricia Tai1, Rashmi Koul2, Khanh Vu3, Trent Edwards1, Joseph Buwembo4, Alisson R Teles5, Muhammad Salim6.
Abstract
A 28-year-old man presented to the emergency room with a severe headache of one day's duration. A computerized tomography scan showed a hemorrhagic tumor measuring 3.9 x 4.4 cm in the left cerebellar hemisphere. The resection specimen revealed medulloblastoma. He had two episodes of rebleeding and multiple postoperative issues preventing the use of prone craniospinal radiotherapy. We designed a supine technique for this tall man, which was not complicated to set up. The rapid safe implementation of this technique allowed us to avoid further rebleeding and successfully treat the residual tumor. This technique is the described technique in this case report and is compared to other techniques. At 7.5 years after surgery, he is alive without cancer and with only a mild residual deficit. This case is unusual since the majority of patients with the diagnosis of hemorrhagic medulloblastoma died.Entities:
Keywords: medulloblastoma; posterior fossa syndrome; radiotherapy; therapy
Year: 2015 PMID: 26819866 PMCID: PMC4723302 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Our supine craniospinal irradiation (CSI) technique
Cranial and superior spine fields use a half-beam block without skin gap. The isocenters of both fields were at mid-cervical level. The inferior spine field was centered on the first lumbar vertebra, marked by a blue arrow. Its upper border matched the diverging lower border of the superior spine field at the sixth thoracic vertebra. The dose was homogeneous within the target without any hot spots. After 36 Gy/20 fractions of CSI, a boost 18 Gy/9 fractions was delivered to the posterior fossa.
Comparison of different craniospinal techniques
D: dimensional
IMRT: intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Inf: inferior
Sup: superior
| Alternatives | Pros vs. Cons | |
| Machine | (1) photon, (2) electron, (3) proton | (1) Simple. (2) Less dose at depth, more complicated matching and sparing may be less for high energy electron. (3) Less dose at depth and risk of a second malignancy, but limited locations of proton facilities. |
| Position | (1) prone, (2) supine | See Discussion section. Supine technique has many advantages. |
| Planning & junctions | Planning: (1) 2D, (2) 3D, (3) IMRT, helical tomotherapy Junctions: Shifting junctions, half-beam block, skin gap and matching 50% isodose at spine, feather the match, overlap fields which have a gradient at match | (1) Simple but requires junction shifts. (2) Narrower spinal fields but more labor intense contouring and planning. (3) Less dose at depth, no need for junction shifts by intensity modulation at match lines but concerns of larger low-dose region areas with higher risk of second malignancy, more labor intense contouring planning and quality assurance. |
| Cranial field | (1) Isocentre fixed in: (1a) mid-brain, (1b) neck junction (half-beam block). (2) Collimator angle: (2a) matches superior spine field divergence. (2b) not required if neck junction is vertical using half-beam block in superior spine field. | (1a) Same shielding block in the cranial field but needs junction shift. (1b) No couch angle for superior spine field and no junction shift. (2b) Simpler to treat as in our case. |
| Superior spine field | (1) Neck junction: (1a) couch angle to match cranial field divergence. (1b) half beam block. (2) Isocentre at (2a) thoracic spine: superior border matches cranial field, (2b) neck junction: half-beam block. (3) Gap(s) with cranial and inferior spine field. | (1a) Junction shifts required. (1b) No couch angle/junction shifts, faster. (2a) Larger superior spine field possible and for some may be able to use a single field, but junction shifts required. (2b) Used in our case, simpler but limits the size of superior field, increased divergence at inferior edge. Hard to verify visually with supine positioning. |
| Inferior spine field | (1) Superior border match superior spine field divergence. (2) Spade expansion to cover nerve root disease, if suspected | (1) Used in our case, simpler but portal imaging required |