Literature DB >> 16328301

Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition.

Annika Akerfelt1, Hans Colonius, Adele Diederich.   

Abstract

In an eye movement countermanding paradigm it is demonstrated for the first time that a tactile stimulus can be an effective stop signal when human participants are to inhibit saccades to a visual target. Estimated stop signal processing times were 90-140 ms, comparable to results with auditory stop signals, but shorter than those commonly found for manual responses. Two of the three participants significantly slowed their reactions in expectation of the stop signal as revealed by a control experiment without stop signals. All participants produced slower responses in the shortest stop signal delay condition than predicted by the race model (Logan and Cowan 1984) along with hypometric saccades on stop failure trials, suggesting that the race model may need to be elaborated to include some component of interaction of stop and go signal processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328301     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0168-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

Review 1.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition.

Authors:  J M Findlay; R Walker
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

3.  Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories.

Authors:  Melanie C Doyle; Robin Walker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Saccadic countermanding: a comparison of central and peripheral stop signals.

Authors:  K N Asrress; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.

Authors:  H Colonius; J Ozyurt; P A Arndt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals.

Authors:  D W Cabel; I T Armstrong; E Reingold; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Multimodal visual-somatosensory integration in saccade generation.

Authors:  Richard Amlôt; Robin Walker; Jon Driver; Charles Spence
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Canceling planned action: an FMRI study of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Michael W Cole; Vikas Y Rao; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Bimodal and trimodal multisensory enhancement: effects of stimulus onset and intensity on reaction time.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-11

10.  Countermanding saccades in humans.

Authors:  D P Hanes; R H Carpenter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Eye-hand coordination in a sequential target contact task.

Authors:  Miles C Bowman; Roland S Johansson; Roland S Johannson; John Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cognitive control and automatic interference in mind and brain: A unified model of saccadic inhibition and countermanding.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Anne Eileen Campbell; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Motonori Yamaguchi; Jeffrey D Schall; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  No Evidence for a Role of Spatially Modulated α-Band Activity in Tactile Remapping and Short-Latency, Overt Orienting Behavior.

Authors:  José P Ossandón; Peter König; Tobias Heed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques.

Authors:  Paul G Middlebrooks; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Design issues and solutions for stop-signal data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.

Authors:  Patrick G Bissett; McKenzie P Hagen; Henry M Jones; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Adaptive proactive inhibitory control for embedded real-time applications.

Authors:  Shufan Yang; T Martin McGinnity; Kongfatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-06-11

9.  OSARI, an Open-Source Anticipated Response Inhibition Task.

Authors:  Jason L He; Rebecca J Hirst; Rohan Puri; James Coxon; Winston Byblow; Mark Hinder; Patrick Skippen; Dora Matzke; Andrew Heathcote; Corey G Wadsley; Tim Silk; Christian Hyde; Dinisha Parmar; Ernest Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; David A Huddleston; Stewart Mostofsky; Inge Leunissen; Hayley J MacDonald; Nahian S Chowdhury; Matthew Gretton; Tess Nikitenko; Bram Zandbelt; Luke Strickland; Nicolaas A J Puts
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-11-09

10.  Stopping eyes and hands: evidence for non-independence of stop and go processes and for a separation of central and peripheral inhibition.

Authors:  Alessandro Gulberti; Petra A Arndt; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.