Literature DB >> 11797089

Multisensory interactions in saccade target selection: curved saccade trajectories.

Melanie C Doyle1, Robin Walker.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, we examined the change in saccade trajectories observed when distractors are presented at non-target locations. The primary aim of the experiments was to examine multisensory interaction effects between the visual, auditory and somatosensory modalities in saccade generation. In each experiment observers made saccades to visual targets above and below fixation in the presence of visual, auditory or tactile stimuli to the left or right of fixation. In experiment 1 distractor location indicated which of two stimuli was the target for the saccade. Saccade trajectories showed strong leftward curvature following right-side distractors and showed rightward curvature following left-side distractors. The largest effects on trajectories were observed for visual distractors, but significant curvature was observed with auditory and somatosensory distractors. In experiment 2 saccades were made following the onset of a visual target (reflexive) or following presentation of an arrow at fixation (voluntary), and task-irrelevant crossmodal distractors were presented simultaneously with target onset. Both voluntary and reflexive saccades were found to curve away from task-irrelevant visual distractors, but auditory and somatosensory distractors did not modulate saccade trajectories. In experiment 3 task-irrelevant distractors preceded the onset of the target by 100 ms. Reflexive saccades were found to curve away from visual, auditory and somatosensory distractors, but voluntary saccades curved away from visual distractors only. The modulation of saccade trajectories by distractors from different modalities is interpreted in terms of inhibitory processes operating in neural structures involved in saccade generation. Our findings suggest that visual, auditory and somatosensory distractors can all modulate saccade trajectories. Such effects could be related to the inhibition of populations of neurons, in a common motor map, for the selection of a saccade target.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11797089     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0919-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Distractor modulation of saccade trajectories: spatial separation and symmetry effects.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Patrick Haggard; Robin Walker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets.

Authors:  Casimir J H Ludwig; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

4.  Are somatosensory saccades voluntary or reflexive?

Authors:  Richard Amlôt; Robin Walker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Preparation and execution of saccades: the problem of limited capacity of computational resources.

Authors:  Uwe J Ilg; Yu Jin; Stefan Schumann; Urs Schwarz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual-tactile saccadic inhibition.

Authors:  Annika Akerfelt; Hans Colonius; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Distractor effects on saccade trajectories: a comparison of prosaccades, antisaccades, and memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Wieske van Zoest; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Crossmodal interaction in saccadic reaction time: separating multisensory from warning effects in the time window of integration model.

Authors:  Adele Diederich; Hans Colonius
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Non-lateralized auditory input enhances averaged vectors in the oculomotor system.

Authors:  N Van der Stoep; T C W Nijboer; S Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Oculomotor responses and visuospatial perceptual judgments compete for common limited resources.

Authors:  Marc S Tibber; Simon Grant; Michael J Morgan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.