Literature DB >> 24306985

Response inhibition during perceptual decision making in humans and macaques.

Paul G Middlebrooks1, Jeffrey D Schall.   

Abstract

Response inhibition in stop signal tasks has been explained as the outcome of a race between GO and STOP processes (e.g., Logan, 1981). Response choice in two-alternative perceptual categorization tasks has been explained as the outcome of an accumulation of evidence for the alternative responses. To begin unifying these two powerful investigation frameworks, we obtained data from humans and macaque monkeys performing a stop signal task with responses guided by perceptual categorization and variable degrees of difficulty, ranging from low to high accuracy. Comparable results across species reinforced the validity of this animal model. Response times and errors increased with categorization difficulty. The probability of failing to inhibit responses on stop signal trials increased with stop signal delay, and the response times for failed stop signal trials were shorter than those for trials with no stop signal. Thus, the Logan race model could be applied to estimate the duration of the stopping process. We found that the duration of the STOP process did not vary across a wide range of discrimination accuracies. This is consistent with the functional, and possibly mechanistic, independence of choice and inhibition mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24306985      PMCID: PMC4141461          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-013-0599-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  57 in total

1.  Don't look! Don't touch! Inhibitory control of eye and hand movements.

Authors:  G D Logan; D E Irwin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.

Authors:  H Colonius; J Ozyurt; P A Arndt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field.

Authors:  A Murthy; K G Thompson; J D Schall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Control of saccade initiation in a countermanding task using visual and auditory stop signals.

Authors:  D W Cabel; I T Armstrong; E Reingold; D P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

6.  Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm.

Authors:  Menno van der Schoot; Robert Licht; Tako M Horsley; Joseph A Sergeant
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2005-08

7.  Are hyperactive children deficient in attentional capacity?

Authors:  R Schachar; G Logan
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1990-10

8.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes.

Authors:  Ritske de Jong; Michael G H Coles; Gordon D Logan; Gabriele Gratton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation.

Authors:  A Osman; S Kornblum; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times.

Authors:  D Laming
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1979-09
View more
  14 in total

1.  Revisiting the evidence for collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Guy E Hawkins; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Roger Ratcliff; Scott D Brown
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Models of inhibitory control.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall; Thomas J Palmeri; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Comparative psychometrics: establishing what differs is central to understanding what evolves.

Authors:  Christoph J Völter; Brandon Tinklenberg; Josep Call; Amanda M Seed
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Accumulators, Neurons, and Response Time.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 6.  The point of no return: A fundamental limit on the ability to control thought and action.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Motonori Yamaguchi; Jeffrey D Schall; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Inhibitory Control in the Cortico-Basal Ganglia-Thalamocortical Loop: Complex Regulation and Interplay with Memory and Decision Processes.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Comparing fixed and collapsing boundary versions of the diffusion model.

Authors:  Chelsea Voskuilen; Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation.

Authors:  Clayton P Mosher; Adam N Mamelak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Nader Pouratian; Ueli Rutishauser
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.