Literature DB >> 11224905

Role of familiar size in the control of grasping.

J J Marotta1, M A Goodale.   

Abstract

The present study examined whether the learned pictorial depth cue of "familiar size" could be used to plan a reaching and grasping movement in the absence of binocular vision. Sixteen right-handed subjects were presented with two different arrays, under monocular and binocular viewing conditions, in which a range of different "grasp-sized" spheres that were lit from within could be presented in an otherwise darkened environment. In the "familiar-size" presentation array, only one "standard" sized sphere was presented, which gave subjects an opportunity to learn the relationship between the standard sphere's retinal image size and its distance. In the "multiple" spheres presentation array, subjects could not learn such a relationship because on any one trial, one of four different sphere sizes could be present. In a second experiment, the effects of this paradigm on six subjects' perceptual reports of distance were examined by having subjects slide their index fingers apart along a horizontal rod to indicate the estimated distance of the spheres. When familiar size could not be used as a cue to distance, subjects produced more on-line corrections in their reaching and grasping movements to the standard-sized spheres--but only under monocular viewing conditions. It appears that subjects are able to exploit the learned relationship between an object's distance and its projected retinal image size to help program and control reaching and grasping movements when binocular vision is not available. Although the influence of familiar size on subjects' perceptual estimates is less clear, it is clear that subjects' perceptual estimates show poor absolute scaling for distance. This result further supports the notion that under normal viewing conditions the visuomotor system uses binocular information to program and control manual prehension, but is able to use pictorial information when binocular vision is denied.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11224905     DOI: 10.1162/089892901564135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The role of binocular vision in grasping: a small stimulus-set distorts results.

Authors:  Bruce D Keefe; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Authors:  Rachel A Herth; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Olivia Cherry; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Binocular Viewing Facilitates Size Constancy for Grasping and Manual Estimation.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Michael Cao; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

6.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Impaired distance perception and size constancy following bilateral occipitoparietal damage.

Authors:  Marian E Berryhill; Robert Fendrich; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Binocular advantage for prehension movements performed in visually enriched environments requiring visual search.

Authors:  Roshani Gnanaseelan; Dave A Gonzalez; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Visuomotor Behaviour in Amblyopia: Deficits and Compensatory Adaptations.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Linda Colpa; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 3.599

10.  Effects of pictorial cues on reaching depend on the distinctiveness of target objects.

Authors:  Andrea Christensen; Svenja Borchers; Marc Himmelbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.