PURPOSE:Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin therapy (EPT) increases mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk substantially more than does estrogen therapy alone. We determined whether increases in serum estrone as a function of treatment predict increases in mammographic percent density. METHODS: We measured mammographic percent density and serum estrone levels in participants in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial who were randomly assigned to receive conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg/d; CEE and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 mg on days 1 to 12 per 28-day cycle; CEE and MPA 2.5 mg/d; or CEE and micronized progesterone (MP) 200 mg on days 1 to 12 per 28-day cycle. We used linear regression to determine whether serum estrone changes predicted mammographic percent density changes from baseline to 1 year. RESULTS:Mammographic percent density increased with increasing change in estrone level in the EPT groups, but not in the CEE group. Combined, the mammographic percent density in the three EPT groups demonstrated an absolute increase of 2.95% per 100 pg/mL increase in serum estrone level (P =.0003). The absolute increases were 4.09% (P =.0018) in the CEE + MPA continuous group, 2.79% (P =.0292) in the CEE + MPA cyclical group, and 1.40% (P =.36) in the CEE + MP group, but the differences among the EPT groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Greater increase in serum estrone level as a function of treatment is a significant predictor of increase in mammographic percent density in women randomly assigned to the combination of estrogen and progestin.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Postmenopausal estrogen and progestin therapy (EPT) increases mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk substantially more than does estrogen therapy alone. We determined whether increases in serum estrone as a function of treatment predict increases in mammographic percent density. METHODS: We measured mammographic percent density and serum estrone levels in participants in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial who were randomly assigned to receive conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) 0.625 mg/d; CEE and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 10 mg on days 1 to 12 per 28-day cycle; CEE and MPA 2.5 mg/d; or CEE and micronized progesterone (MP) 200 mg on days 1 to 12 per 28-day cycle. We used linear regression to determine whether serum estrone changes predicted mammographic percent density changes from baseline to 1 year. RESULTS: Mammographic percent density increased with increasing change in estrone level in the EPT groups, but not in the CEE group. Combined, the mammographic percent density in the three EPT groups demonstrated an absolute increase of 2.95% per 100 pg/mL increase in serum estrone level (P =.0003). The absolute increases were 4.09% (P =.0018) in the CEE + MPA continuous group, 2.79% (P =.0292) in the CEE + MPA cyclical group, and 1.40% (P =.36) in the CEE + MP group, but the differences among the EPT groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Greater increase in serum estrone level as a function of treatment is a significant predictor of increase in mammographic percent density in women randomly assigned to the combination of estrogen and progestin.
Authors: Eunjung Lee; Sue A Ingles; David Van Den Berg; Wei Wang; Chris Lavallee; Mei-Hua Huang; Carolyn J Crandall; Frank Z Stanczyk; Gail A Greendale; Giske Ursin Journal: Menopause Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Melinda L Irwin; Erin J Aiello; Anne McTiernan; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein; Frank D Gilliland; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2005-11-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Britton Trabert; Rebecca Troisi; Tom Grotmol; Anders Ekbom; Anders Engeland; Mika Gissler; Ingrid Glimelius; Laura Madanat-Harjuoja; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Steinar Tretli; Anne Gulbech Ording; Tone Bjørge Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 7.316
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Min Guan; Gail A Laughlin; Giske A Ursin; Frank Z Stanczyk; Sue A Ingles; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Gail A Greendale Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Aaron K Aragaki; Rowan T Chlebowski; Anne McTiernan; Garnet Anderson; Susan L Hendrix; Barbara B Cochrane; Lewis H Kuller; Jane A Cauley Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-10-12
Authors: Carolyn Crandall; Shana Palla; Beth A Reboussin; Giske Ursin; Gail A Greendale Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Sarah J Lord; Wendy J Mack; David Van Den Berg; Malcolm C Pike; Sue A Ingles; Christopher A Haiman; Wei Wang; Yuri R Parisky; Howard N Hodis; Giske Ursin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-02-23 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Eunjung Lee; Jianning Luo; Yu-Chen Su; Juan Pablo Lewinger; Fredrick R Schumacher; David Van Den Berg; Anna H Wu; Leslie Bernstein; Giske Ursin Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2014-12-11 Impact factor: 8.408