Literature DB >> 16311591

Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement.

Martin Voss1, James N Ingram, Patrick Haggard, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

Voluntary actions typically produce suppression of afferent sensation from the moving body part. We used transcranial magnetic stimulation to delay the output of motor commands from the motor cortex during voluntary movement. We show attenuation of sensation during this delay, in the absence of movement. We conclude that sensory suppression mainly relies on central signals related to the preparation for movement and that these signals are upstream of primary motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16311591      PMCID: PMC2636578          DOI: 10.1038/nn1592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  14 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; C D Frith; D M Wolpert
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Pre-movement gating of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  H Shimazu; R Kaji; N Murase; N Kohara; A Ikeda; H Shibasaki; J Kimura; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-08-20       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Gating of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during the preparatory period of self-initiated finger movement.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Minoru Hoshiyama; Hiroki Nakata; Yoshiaki Nishihira; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Suppression of cutaneous perception by magnetic pulse stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  M Seyal; L K Masuoka; J K Browne
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-12

5.  Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks.

Authors:  Stephan R Williams; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Differentiation of sensorimotor neuronal structures responsible for induction of motor evoked potentials, attenuation in detection of somatosensory stimuli, and induction of sensation of movement by mapping of optimal current directions.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; J Valls-Solé; M Hallett
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-06

7.  Delay in simple reaction time after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain occurs at the final motor output stage.

Authors:  U Ziemann; F Tergau; J Netz; V Hömberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; A Maertens de Noordhout; K Nakashima; K Shannon; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Sensory perception during movement in man.

Authors:  C E Chapman; M C Bushnell; D Miron; G H Duncan; J P Lund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The processing of human ballistic movements explored by stimulation over the cortex.

Authors:  E Palmer; E Cafarelli; P Ashby
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  57 in total

1.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Authors:  Laila Alibiglou; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Somatosensory effects of action inhibition: a study with the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Eamonn Walsh; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Human control of an inverted pendulum: is continuous control necessary? Is intermittent control effective? Is intermittent control physiological?

Authors:  Ian D Loram; Henrik Gollee; Martin Lakie; Peter J Gawthrop
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  The internal structure of stopping as revealed by a sensory detection task.

Authors:  Eammon Walsh; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Action preparation enhances the processing of tactile targets.

Authors:  Georgiana Juravle; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Did I do that? Abnormal predictive processes in schizophrenia when button pressing to deliver a tone.

Authors:  Judith M Ford; Vanessa A Palzes; Brian J Roach; Daniel H Mathalon
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Enhancement of response times to bi- and tri-modal sensory stimuli during active movements.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.