Literature DB >> 22124142

The early release of planned movement by acoustic startle can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex.

Laila Alibiglou1, Colum D MacKinnon.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that preplanned movements can be rapidly released when a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS) is presented immediately prior to, or coincident with, the imperative signal to initiate movement. Based on the short latency of the onset of muscle activity (typically in less than 90 ms) and the frequent co-expression of startle responses in the neck and eye muscles, it has been proposed that the release of planned movements by a SAS is mediated by subcortical, possibly brainstem, pathways. However, a role for cortical structures in mediating these responses cannot be ruled out based on timing arguments alone. We examined the role of the cortex in the mediation of these responses by testing if a suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the primary motor cortex, which suppresses voluntary drive and is known to delay movement initiation, could delay the release of movement by a SAS. Eight subjects performed an instructed-delay task requiring them to make a ballistic wrist movement to a target in response to an acoustic tone (control task condition). In a subset of trials subjects received one of the following: (1) suprathreshold TMS over the contralateral primary motor cortex 70 ms prior to their mean response time on control trials (TMS(CT)), (2) SAS 200 ms prior to the go cue (SAS), (3) suprathreshold TMS 70 ms prior to the mean SAS-evoked response time (TMS(SAS)), or (4) TMS(SAS) and SAS presented concurrently (TMS+SAS). Movement kinematics and EMG from the wrist extensors and flexors and sternocleidomastoid muscles were recorded. The application of TMS(CT) prior to control voluntary movements produced a significant delay in movement onset times (P < 0.001) (average delay = 37.7 ± 12.8 ms). The presentation of a SAS alone at -200 ms resulted in the release of the planned movement an average of 71.7 ± 2.7 ms after the startling stimulus. The early release of movement by a SAS was significantly delayed (P < 0.001, average delay = 35.0 ± 12.9 ms) when TMS(SAS) and SAS were presented concurrently. This delay could not be explained by a prolonged suppression of motor unit activity at the spinal level. These findings provide evidence that the release of targeted ballistic wrist movements by SAS is mediated, in part, by a fast conducting transcortical pathway via the primary motor cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124142      PMCID: PMC3381319          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.219592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  56 in total

1.  A startle speeds up the execution of externally guided saccades.

Authors:  Juan M Castellote; Hatice Kumru; Ana Queralt; Josep Valls-Solé
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The startle reflex, voluntary movement, and the reticulospinal tract.

Authors:  J C Rothwell
Journal:  Suppl Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006

3.  Startle produces early response latencies that are distinct from stimulus intensity effects.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Chris J Dakin; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preparation of anticipatory postural adjustments prior to stepping.

Authors:  Colum D MacKinnon; Dennis Bissig; Julie Chiusano; Emily Miller; Laura Rudnick; Candice Jager; Yunhui Zhang; Marie-Laure Mille; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Parallels in control of voluntary and perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp movements: EMG and kinematics.

Authors:  William H Gage; Karl F Zabjek; Stephen W Hill; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans.

Authors:  Josep Valls-Solé; Hatice Kumru; Markus Kofler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Delay in simple reaction time after focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain occurs at the final motor output stage.

Authors:  U Ziemann; F Tergau; J Netz; V Hömberg
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Altered triggering of a prepared movement by a startling stimulus.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Michael A Hunt; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Short interval intracortical inhibition and facilitation during the silent period in human.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Carolyn Gunraj; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  33 in total

1.  Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.

Authors:  A J T Stevenson; C Chiu; D Maslovat; R Chua; B Gick; J-S Blouin; I M Franks
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Michael Kharouta; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Pause time alters the preparation of two-component movements.

Authors:  Michael C Bajema; Colum D MacKinnon; Michael J Carter; Michael Kennefick; Sam Perlmutter; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Corticospinal modulation induced by sounds depends on action preparedness.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; James R Tresilian; Aymar de Rugy; Simranjit Sidhu; Stephan Riek
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Erin K Cressman; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The early release of actions by loud sounds in muscles with distinct connectivity.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Aymar de Rugy; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Deficits in startle-evoked arm movements increase with impairment following stroke.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Neural processes mediating the preparation and release of focal motor output are suppressed or absent during imagined movement.

Authors:  Jeremy S Eagles; Anthony N Carlsen; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Mechanical perturbations can elicit triggered reactions in the absence of a startle response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Kimberly Bennett; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.