Literature DB >> 10511643

Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli.

S J Blakemore1, C D Frith, D M Wolpert.   

Abstract

We investigated why self-produced tactile stimulation is perceived as less intense than the same stimulus produced externally. A tactile stimulus on the palm of the right hand was either externally produced, by a robot or self-produced by the subject. In the conditions in which the tactile stimulus was self-produced, subjects moved the arm of a robot with their left hand to produce the tactile stimulus on their right hand via a second robot. Subjects were asked to rate intensity of the tactile sensation and consistently rated self-produced tactile stimuli as less tickly, intense, and pleasant than externally produced tactile stimuli. Using this robotic setup we were able to manipulate the correspondence between the action of the subjects' left hand and the tactile stimulus on their right hand. First, we parametrically varied the delay between the movement of the left hand and the resultant movement of the tactile stimulus on the right hand. Second, we implemented varying degrees of trajectory perturbation and varied the direction of the tactile stimulus movement as a function of the direction of left-hand movement. The tickliness rating increased significantly with increasing delay and trajectory perturbation. This suggests that self-produced movements attenuate the resultant tactile sensation and that a necessary requirement of this attenuation is that the tactile stimulus and its causal motor command correspond in time and space. We propose that the extent to which self-produced tactile sensation is attenuated (i.e., its tickliness) is proportional to the error between the sensory feedback predicted by an internal forward model of the motor system and the actual sensory feedback produced by the movement.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10511643     DOI: 10.1162/089892999563607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  185 in total

Review 1.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action.

Authors:  C D Frith; S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Voluntary action expands perceived duration of its sensory consequence.

Authors:  Junghyun Park; Madeleine Schlag-Rey; John Schlag
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Ipsilateral finger representations in the sensorimotor cortex are driven by active movement processes, not passive sensory input.

Authors:  Eva Berlot; George Prichard; Jill O'Reilly; Naveed Ejaz; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Toward a neurobiology of delusions.

Authors:  P R Corlett; J R Taylor; X-J Wang; P C Fletcher; J H Krystal
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  Temporal and spatial constraints of action effect on sensory binding.

Authors:  Xavier Corveleyn; Joan Lopez-Moliner; Yann Coello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Prior experience and current goals affect muscle-spindle and tactile integration.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement.

Authors:  Martin Voss; James N Ingram; Patrick Haggard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-27       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.