Literature DB >> 10574351

Pre-movement gating of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials.

H Shimazu1, R Kaji, N Murase, N Kohara, A Ikeda, H Shibasaki, J Kimura, J C Rothwell.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are reduced in amplitude during movement (gating). The mechanism involves central gating of afferent input and competition from other afferents activated by the movement. We distinguished these two by giving 11 normal subjects a warning sound followed 1 s later by an electric stimulus to the right median nerve at the wrist. The latter served both as a cue to start a finger movement and as stimulation to evoke SEPs. Gating effects were widespread in frontal (N30) and central (N60) areas, but were also seen, albeit to a lesser extent, in the recordings at P3 (P30). Since finger movement began after the stimulus, such gating must have been purely central in origin, presumably reflecting motor preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10574351     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199908200-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  13 in total

1.  Centrifugal regulation of task-relevant somatosensory signals to trigger a voluntary movement.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Changes in the centrifugal gating effect on somatosensory evoked potentials depending on the level of contractile force.

Authors:  T Wasaka; H Nakata; T Kida; R Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement.

Authors:  Martin Voss; James N Ingram; Patrick Haggard; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-27       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Centrifugal regulation of a task-relevant somatosensory signal triggering voluntary movement without a preceding warning signal.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Bettina Forster; José Van Velzen; Gita Prabhu
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Tactile gating in a reaching and grasping task.

Authors:  Francisco L Colino; Gavin Buckingham; Darian T Cheng; Paul van Donkelaar; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-03-24

7.  Sensorimotor modulation differs with load type during constant finger force or position.

Authors:  Hikari Kirimoto; Hiroyuki Tamaki; Makoto Suzuki; Takuya Matsumoto; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Syo Kojima; Hideaki Onishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Do gravity-related sensory information enable the enhancement of cortical proprioceptive inputs when planning a step in microgravity?

Authors:  Anahid H Saradjian; Dany Paleressompoulle; Didier Louber; Thelma Coyle; Jean Blouin; Laurence Mouchnino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  When standing on a moving support, cutaneous inputs provide sufficient information to plan the anticipatory postural adjustments for gait initiation.

Authors:  Laurence Mouchnino; Jean Blouin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals.

Authors:  Martin Voss; James N Ingram; Daniel M Wolpert; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.