Literature DB >> 16306413

Prediction and decoding of retinal ganglion cell responses with a probabilistic spiking model.

Jonathan W Pillow1, Liam Paninski, Valerie J Uzzell, Eero P Simoncelli, E J Chichilnisky.   

Abstract

Sensory encoding in spiking neurons depends on both the integration of sensory inputs and the intrinsic dynamics and variability of spike generation. We show that the stimulus selectivity, reliability, and timing precision of primate retinal ganglion cell (RGC) light responses can be reproduced accurately with a simple model consisting of a leaky integrate-and-fire spike generator driven by a linearly filtered stimulus, a postspike current, and a Gaussian noise current. We fit model parameters for individual RGCs by maximizing the likelihood of observed spike responses to a stochastic visual stimulus. Although compact, the fitted model predicts the detailed time structure of responses to novel stimuli, accurately capturing the interaction between the spiking history and sensory stimulus selectivity. The model also accounts for the variability in responses to repeated stimuli, even when fit to data from a single (nonrepeating) stimulus sequence. Finally, the model can be used to derive an explicit, maximum-likelihood decoding rule for neural spike trains, thus providing a tool for assessing the limitations that spiking variability imposes on sensory performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16306413      PMCID: PMC6725882          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3305-05.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  132 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Lateral Intraparietal Area in (the Study of) Decision Making.

Authors:  Alexander C Huk; Leor N Katz; Jacob L Yates
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Linking the computational structure of variance adaptation to biophysical mechanisms.

Authors:  Yusuf Ozuysal; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Inferring synaptic inputs given a noisy voltage trace via sequential Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Liam Paninski; Michael Vidne; Brian DePasquale; Daniel Gil Ferreira
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Role of the zebra finch auditory thalamus in generating complex representations for natural sounds.

Authors:  Noopur Amin; Patrick Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Bayesian inference for generalized linear models for spiking neurons.

Authors:  Sebastian Gerwinn; Jakob H Macke; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  A generalized linear model of the impact of direct and indirect inputs to the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Baktash Babadi; Alexander Casti; Youping Xiao; Ehud Kaplan; Liam Paninski
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes.

Authors:  Lane T McIntosh; Niru Maheswaranathan; Aran Nayebi; Surya Ganguli; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2016

10.  Autophosphorylated CaMKII Facilitates Spike Propagation in Rat Optic Nerve.

Authors:  Gloria J Partida; Anna Fasoli; Alex Fogli Iseppe; Genki Ogata; Jeffrey S Johnson; Vithya Thambiaiyah; Christopher L Passaglia; Andrew T Ishida
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.