Literature DB >> 22279194

The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Deepankar Mohanty1, Benjamin Scholl, Nicholas J Priebe.   

Abstract

A common technique used to study the response selectivity of neurons is to measure the relationship between sensory stimulation and action potential responses. Action potentials, however, are only indirectly related to the synaptic inputs that determine the underlying, subthreshold, response selectivity. We present a method to predict membrane potential, the measurable result of the convergence of synaptic inputs, based on spike rate alone and then test its utility by comparing predictions to actual membrane potential recordings from simple cells in primary visual cortex. Using a noise stimulus, we found that spike rate receptive fields were in precise correspondence with membrane potential receptive fields (R(2) = 0.74). On average, spike rate alone could predict 44% of membrane potential fluctuations to dynamic noise stimuli, demonstrating the utility of this method to extract estimates of subthreshold responses. We also found that the nonlinear relationship between membrane potential and spike rate could also be extracted from spike rate data alone by comparing predictions from the noise stimulus with the actual spike rate. Our analysis reveals that linear receptive field models extracted from noise stimuli accurately reflect the underlying membrane potential selectivity and thus represent a method to generate estimates of the underlying average membrane potential from spike rate data alone.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22279194      PMCID: PMC3331607          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01176.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  52 in total

1.  Dynamic spike threshold reveals a mechanism for synaptic coincidence detection in cortical neurons in vivo.

Authors:  R Azouz; C M Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Membrane mechanisms underlying contrast adaptation in cat area 17 in vivo.

Authors:  M V Sanchez-Vives; L G Nowak; D A McCormick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Linear and nonlinear contributions to orientation tuning of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  J L Gardner; A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  J S Anderson; I Lampl; D C Gillespie; D Ferster
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission.

Authors:  N Brenner; W Bialek; R de Ruyter van Steveninck
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Adaptation to temporal contrast in primate and salamander retina.

Authors:  D Chander; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  On the classification of simple and complex cells.

Authors:  Ferenc Mechler; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Neural noise can explain expansive, power-law nonlinearities in neural response functions.

Authors:  Kenneth D Miller; Todd W Troyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses.

Authors:  E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.273

10.  Adaptation of the simple or complex nature of V1 receptive fields to visual statistics.

Authors:  Julien Fournier; Cyril Monier; Marc Pananceau; Yves Frégnac
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  6 in total

1.  Functional characterization of spikelet activity in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin Scholl; Sari Andoni; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Inferring synaptic inputs from spikes with a conductance-based neural encoding model.

Authors:  Kenneth W Latimer; Fred Rieke; Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Multiple Timescales Account for Adaptive Responses across Sensory Cortices.

Authors:  Kenneth W Latimer; Dylan Barbera; Michael Sokoletsky; Bshara Awwad; Yonatan Katz; Israel Nelken; Ilan Lampl; Adriene L Fairhall; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The statistics of how natural images drive the responses of neurons.

Authors:  Arvind Iyer; Johannes Burge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Mechanisms of neuronal computation in mammalian visual cortex.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; David Ferster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Animation of natural scene by virtual eye-movements evokes high precision and low noise in V1 neurons.

Authors:  Pierre Baudot; Manuel Levy; Olivier Marre; Cyril Monier; Marc Pananceau; Yves Frégnac
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.492

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.