Literature DB >> 17679088

An AT-rich sequence in human common fragile site FRA16D causes fork stalling and chromosome breakage in S. cerevisiae.

Haihua Zhang1, Catherine H Freudenreich.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites are regions of human chromosomes prone to breakage. Fragile site FRA16D spans the WWOX/FOR tumor suppressor gene and has been linked to cancer-causing deletions and translocations. Using a genetic assay in yeast, we found that a short AT-rich region (Flex1) within FRA16D increases chromosome fragility, whereas three other sequences within FRA16D do not. To our knowledge, this is the first identification of a sequence element within a common fragile site that increases chromosome fragility. The fragility of Flex1 was exacerbated by the absence of Rad52 or the presence of hydroxyurea. Flex1 contains a polymorphic AT repeat predicted to form a DNA structure, and two-dimensional gel analysis showed accumulation of stalled replication forks at the Flex1 sequence that was dependent on AT length. Our data suggest that the FRA16D Flex1 sequence causes increased chromosome breakage by forming secondary structures that stall replication fork progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17679088      PMCID: PMC2144737          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  39 in total

Review 1.  The Mre11 complex: at the crossroads of dna repair and checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Damien D'Amours; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  WWOX, the FRA16D gene, behaves as a suppressor of tumor growth.

Authors:  A K Bednarek; C L Keck-Waggoner; R L Daniel; K J Laflin; P L Bergsagel; K Kiguchi; A J Brenner; C M Aldaz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Chromosomal fragile site FRA16D and DNA instability in cancer.

Authors:  M Mangelsdorf; K Ried; E Woollatt; S Dayan; H Eyre; M Finnis; L Hobson; J Nancarrow; D Venter; E Baker; R I Richards
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Fragile and unstable chromosomes in cancer: causes and consequences.

Authors:  R I Richards
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Genetic analysis of the in vivo role of DNA polymerases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  M Cooley; N C Mishra
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.886

Review 7.  FRA3B and other common fragile sites: the weakest links.

Authors:  K Huebner; C M Croce
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  The characterization of the common fragile site FRA16D and its involvement in multiple myeloma translocations.

Authors:  K A Krummel; L R Roberts; M Kawakami; T W Glover; D I Smith
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5' to 3' DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA.

Authors:  Andreas S Ivessa; Jin-Qiu Zhou; Vince P Schulz; Ellen K Monson; Virginia A Zakian
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  100 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal translocations and palindromic AT-rich repeats.

Authors:  Takema Kato; Hiroki Kurahashi; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Genomic rearrangements at the FRA2H common fragile site frequently involve non-homologous recombination events across LTR and L1(LINE) repeats.

Authors:  Lena M Brueckner; Evgeny Sagulenko; Elisa M Hess; Diana Zheglo; Anne Blumrich; Manfred Schwab; Larissa Savelyeva
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Fragile regions and not functional constraints predominate in shaping gene organization in the genus Drosophila.

Authors:  Marcin von Grotthuss; Michael Ashburner; José M Ranz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Guy-Franck Richard; Alix Kerrest; Bernard Dujon
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

5.  Replication stalling at unstable inverted repeats: interplay between DNA hairpins and fork stabilizing proteins.

Authors:  Irina Voineagu; Vidhya Narayanan; Kirill S Lobachev; Sergei M Mirkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Comparative sequence analysis of primate subtelomeres originating from a chromosome fission event.

Authors:  M Katharine Rudd; Raelynn M Endicott; Cynthia Friedman; Megan Walker; Janet M Young; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Pieter J de Jong; Eric D Green; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Effects of hydroxyurea on CNV induction in the mouse germline.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Sountharia Rajendran; Sandra N Holmes; Kathleen Wang; Ingrid L Bergin; Samreen Ahmed; Thomas E Wilson; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  Complex DNA structures trigger copy number variation across the Plasmodium falciparum genome.

Authors:  Adam C Huckaby; Claire S Granum; Maureen A Carey; Karol Szlachta; Basel Al-Barghouthi; Yuh-Hwa Wang; Jennifer L Guler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism.

Authors:  Ken'Ichi Mizuno; Sarah Lambert; Giuseppe Baldacci; Johanne M Murray; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.