Literature DB >> 15020445

The effect of genetic conflict on genomic imprinting and modification of expression at a sex-linked locus.

Hamish G Spencer1, Marcus W Feldman, Andrew G Clark, Anton E Weisstein.   

Abstract

We examine how genomic imprinting may have evolved at an X-linked locus, using six diallelic models of selection in which one allele is imprintable and the other is not. Selection pressures are generated by genetic conflict between mothers and their offspring. The various models describe cases of maternal and paternal inactivation, in which females may be monogamous or bigamous. When inactivation is maternal, we examine the situations in which only female offspring exhibit imprinting as well as when both sexes do. We compare our results to those previously obtained for an autosomal locus and to four models in which a dominant modifier of biallelic expression is subjected to the same selection pressures. We find that, in accord with verbal predictions, maternal inactivation of growth enhancers and paternal inactivation of growth inhibitors are more likely than imprinting in the respective opposite directions, although these latter outcomes are possible for certain parameter combinations. The expected outcomes are easier to evolve than the same outcomes for autosomal loci, contradicting the available evidence concerning the direction of imprinting on mammalian sex chromosomes. In most of our models stable polymorphism of imprinting status is possible, a behavior not predicted by verbal accounts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15020445      PMCID: PMC1470692          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.166.1.565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  31 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting in mammalian development: a parental tug-of-war.

Authors:  T Moore; D Haig
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Recombination and the evolution of diploidy.

Authors:  S P Otto; D B Goldstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genomic imprinting and the strange case of the insulin-like growth factor II receptor.

Authors:  D Haig; C Graham
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-03-22       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Gametic imprinting in mammals.

Authors:  D P Barlow
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Genomic imprinting and mammalian development.

Authors:  G C Franklin; G I Adam; R Ohlsson
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  The maintenance of single-locus polymorphism. I. Numerical studies of a viability selection model.

Authors:  H G Spencer; R W Marks
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Polymorphic X-chromosome inactivation of the human TIMP1 gene.

Authors:  C L Anderson; C J Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Parental genomic imprinting of the human IGF2 gene.

Authors:  N Giannoukakis; C Deal; J Paquette; C G Goodyer; C Polychronakos
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Parental imprinting of rat insulin-like growth factor II gene promoters is coordinately regulated.

Authors:  P V Pedone; M P Cosma; P Ungaro; V Colantuoni; C B Bruni; R Zarrilli; A Riccio
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-09-30       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Mosaic and polymorphic imprinting of the WT1 gene in humans.

Authors:  Y Jinno; K Yun; K Nishiwaki; T Kubota; O Ogawa; A E Reeve; N Niikawa
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  15 in total

1.  Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Troy Day; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Polyandry, life-history trade-offs and the evolution of imprinting at Mendelian loci.

Authors:  Walter Mills; Tom Moore
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Population models of genomic imprinting. II. Maternal and fertility selection.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Timothy Dorn; Thomas LoFaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; A G Clark
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 7.  Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Genomic imprinting leads to less selectively maintained polymorphism on X chromosomes.

Authors:  Anna W Santure; Hamish G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Sexuality: measures of partnerships, practices, attitudes, and problems in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Study.

Authors:  Linda J Waite; Edward O Laumann; Aniruddha Das; L Philip Schumm
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Brain and placental transcriptional responses as a readout of maternal and paternal preconception stress are fetal sex specific.

Authors:  Yasmine M Cissé; Jennifer C Chan; Bridget M Nugent; Caitlin Banducci; Tracy L Bale
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2020-07-12       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.