Literature DB >> 17483403

Mutational bias for body size in rhabditid nematodes.

Dejerianne Ostrow1, Naomi Phillips, Arián Avalos, Dustin Blanton, Ashley Boggs, Thomas Keller, Laura Levy, Jeffrey Rosenbloom, Charles F Baer.   

Abstract

Mutational bias is a potentially important agent of evolution, but it is difficult to disentangle the effects of mutation from those of natural selection. Mutation-accumulation experiments, in which mutations are allowed to accumulate at very small population size, thus minimizing the efficiency of natural selection, are the best way to separate the effects of mutation from those of selection. Body size varies greatly among species of nematode in the family rhabditidae; mutational biases are both a potential cause and a consequence of that variation. We report data on the cumulative effects of mutations that affect body size in three species of rhabditid nematode that vary fivefold in adult size. Results are very consistent with previous studies of mutations underlying fitness in the same strains: two strains of Caenorhabditis briggsae decline in body size about twice as fast as two strains of C. elegans, with a concomitant higher point estimate of the genomic mutation rate; the confamilial Oscheius myriophila is intermediate. There is an overall mutational bias, such that mutations reduce size on average, but the bias appears consistent between species. The genetic correlation between mutations that affect size and those underlying fitness is large and positive, on average.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17483403      PMCID: PMC1931521          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.074666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  43 in total

Review 1.  Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates.

Authors:  P D Keightley; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Accelerated molecular evolution in halophilic crustaceans.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Elpidio A Remigio; John K Colbourne; Derek J Taylor; Christopher C Wilson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock.

Authors:  James F Gillooly; Andrew P Allen; Geoffrey B West; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of deleterious mutations in allopatric speciation.

Authors:  Max Shpak
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Increase of the spontaneous mutation rate in a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Victoria Avila; David Chavarrías; Enrique Sánchez; Antonio Manrique; Carlos López-Fanjul; Aurora García-Dorado
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Somatic polyploidization and cellular proliferation drive body size evolution in nematodes.

Authors:  A J Flemming; Z Z Shen; A Cunha; S W Emmons; A M Leroi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Quantitative genetics of ovariole number in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutational variation and genotype-environment interaction.

Authors:  M L Wayne; T F Mackay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Multigeneration maximum-likelihood analysis applied to mutation-accumulation experiments in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  P D Keightley; T M Bataillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  19 in total

1.  Rapid decline in fitness of mutation accumulation lines of gonochoristic (outcrossing) Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Joanna Joyner-Matos; Dejerianne Ostrow; Veronica Grigaltchik; Matthew P Salomon; Ambuj Upadhyay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Fluorescence-based fixative and vital staining of lipid droplets in Caenorhabditis elegans reveal fat stores using microscopy and flow cytometry approaches.

Authors:  Maja Klapper; Madeleine Ehmke; Daniela Palgunow; Mike Böhme; Christian Matthäus; Gero Bergner; Benjamin Dietzek; Jürgen Popp; Frank Döring
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  The anomalous effects of biased mutation revisited: mean-optimum deviation and apparent directional selection under stabilizing selection.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Comparing mutational and standing genetic variability for fitness and size in Caenorhabditis briggsae and C. elegans.

Authors:  Matthew P Salomon; Dejerianne Ostrow; Naomi Phillips; Dustin Blanton; Whitney Bour; Thomas E Keller; Laura Levy; Thamar Sylvestre; Ambuj Upadhyay; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic (Co)variation for life span in rhabditid nematodes: role of mutation, selection, and history.

Authors:  Joanna Joyner-Matos; Ambuj Upadhyay; Matthew P Salomon; Veronica Grigaltchik; Charles F Baer
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Efficacy of Four Nematicides Against the Reproduction and Development of Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Bi; Yanting Gong; Xiaojuan Huang; Hongshi Yu; Liqun Bai; Jiafu Hu
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.402

7.  The red death meets the abdominal bristle: polygenic mutation for susceptibility to a bacterial pathogen in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Veronique Etienne; Erik C Andersen; José Miguel Ponciano; Dustin Blanton; Analucia Cadavid; Joanna Joyner-Matos; Chikako Matsuba; Brandon Tabman; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Bias and evolution of the mutationally accessible phenotypic space in a developmental system.

Authors:  Christian Braendle; Charles F Baer; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  The mutational structure of metabolism in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Sarah K Davies; Armand Leroi; Austin Burt; Jacob G Bundy; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Spontaneous mutations decrease sensitivity of gene expression to random environmental variation in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Dee R Denver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.