Literature DB >> 18660537

Within-generation mutation variance for litter size in inbred mice.

Joaquim Casellas1, Juan F Medrano.   

Abstract

The mutational input of genetic variance per generation (sigma(m)(2)) is the lower limit of the genetic variability in inbred strains of mice, although greater values could be expected due to the accumulation of new mutations in successive generations. A mixed-model analysis using Bayesian methods was applied to estimate sigma(m)(2) and the across-generation accumulated genetic variability on litter size in 46 generations of a C57BL/6J inbred strain. This allowed for a separate inference on sigma(m)(2) and on the additive genetic variance in the base population (sigma(a)(2)). The additive genetic variance in the base generation was 0.151 and quickly decreased to almost null estimates in generation 10. On the other hand, sigma(m)(2) was moderate (0.035) and the within-generation mutational variance increased up to generation 14, then oscillating between 0.102 and 0.234 in remaining generations. This pattern suggested the existence of a continuous uploading of genetic variability for litter size (h(2)=0.045). Relevant genetic drift was not detected in this population. In conclusion, our approach allowed for separate estimation of sigma(a)(2) and sigma(m)(2) within the mixed-model framework, and the heritability obtained highlighted the significant and continuous influence of new genetic variability affecting the genetic stability of inbred strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18660537      PMCID: PMC2516086          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.088070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  30 in total

1.  Inferring the trajectory of genetic variance in the course of artificial selection.

Authors:  D Sorensen; R Fernando; D Gianola
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  The genetics of litter size in mice.

Authors:  D S FALCONER
Journal:  J Cell Comp Physiol       Date:  1960-11

3.  Quantitative genetic variation in body size of mice from new mutations.

Authors:  P D Keightley; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetics. A century of corn selection.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Heterosis among lines of mice selected for body weight : 2. Reproduction.

Authors:  C K Bhuvanakumar; R C Roberts; W G Hill
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Comparing mutational variabilities.

Authors:  D Houle; B Morikawa; M Lynch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Bayesian inference of genetic parameters and selection response for litter size components in pigs.

Authors:  A Blasco; D Sorensen; J P Bidanel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Polygenic mutation in Drosophila melanogaster: estimates from response to selection of inbred strains.

Authors:  T F Mackay; J D Fry; R F Lyman; S V Nuzhdin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Rates of change in quantitative traits from fixation of new mutations.

Authors:  W G Hill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  9 in total

1.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Impact of Genomic and Traditional Selection on the Contribution of Mutational Variance to Long-Term Selection Response and Genetic Variance.

Authors:  Herman A Mulder; Sang Hong Lee; Sam Clark; Ben J Hayes; Julius H J van der Werf
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genome scans for transmission ratio distortion regions in mice.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Rodrigo J Gularte; Charles R Farber; Luis Varona; Margarete Mehrabian; Eric E Schadt; Aldon J Lusis; Alan D Attie; Brian S Yandell; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Towards mouse genetic-specific RNA-sequencing read mapping.

Authors:  Nastassia Gobet; Maxime Jan; Paul Franken; Ioannis Xenarios
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.779

5.  Evidence of maternal QTL affecting growth and obesity in adult mice.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Charles R Farber; Rodrigo J Gularte; Kari A Haus; Craig H Warden; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Segregation analysis of a sex ratio distortion locus in congenic mice.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Charles R Farber; Ricardo A Verdugo; Juan F Medrano
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  The contribution of mutation and selection to multivariate quantitative genetic variance in an outbred population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Robert J Dugand; J David Aguirre; Emma Hine; Mark W Blows; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Association of FOXD1 variants with adverse pregnancy outcomes in mice and humans.

Authors:  Paul Laissue; Besma Lakhal; Magalie Vatin; Frank Batista; Gaëtan Burgio; Eric Mercier; Esther Dos Santos; Christophe Buffat; Diana Carolina Sierra-Diaz; Gilles Renault; Xavier Montagutelli; Jane Salmon; Philippe Monget; Reiner A Veitia; Céline Méhats; Marc Fellous; Jean-Christophe Gris; Julie Cocquet; Daniel Vaiman
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.411

9.  Discovering lethal alleles across the turkey genome using a transmission ratio distortion approach.

Authors:  E A Abdalla; S Id-Lahoucine; A Cánovas; J Casellas; F S Schenkel; B J Wood; C F Baes
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.