Literature DB >> 16269103

Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.

Roberto Caldara1, Philippe Schyns, Eugène Mayer, Marie L Smith, Frédéric Gosselin, Bruno Rossion.   

Abstract

One of the most impressive disorders following brain damage to the ventral occipitotemporal cortex is prosopagnosia, or the inability to recognize faces. Although acquired prosopagnosia with preserved general visual and memory functions is rare, several cases have been described in the neuropsychological literature and studied at the functional and neural level over the last decades. Here we tested a brain-damaged patient (PS) presenting a deficit restricted to the category of faces to clarify the nature of the missing and preserved components of the face processing system when it is selectively damaged. Following learning to identify 10 neutral and happy faces through extensive training, we investigated patient PS's recognition of faces using Bubbles, a response classification technique that sampled facial information across the faces in different bandwidths of spatial frequencies [Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. E., Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271, 2001]. Although PS gradually used less information (i.e., the number of bubbles) to identify faces over testing, the total information required was much larger than for normal controls and decreased less steeply with practice. Most importantly, the facial information used to identify individual faces differed between PS and controls. Specifically, in marked contrast to controls, PS did not use the optimal eye information to identify familiar faces, but instead the lower part of the face, including the mouth and the external contours, as normal observers typically do when processing unfamiliar faces. Together, the findings reported here suggest that damage to the face processing system is characterized by an inability to use the information that is optimal to judge identity, focusing instead on suboptimal information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16269103     DOI: 10.1162/089892905774597254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  38 in total

1.  Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; James W Tanaka; Sophie Lebrecht; Michael J Tarr; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-08

2.  The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A face is more than just the eyes, nose, and mouth: fMRI evidence that face-selective cortex represents external features.

Authors:  Frederik S Kamps; Ethan J Morris; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  The neuropsychology of face perception: beyond simple dissociations and functional selectivity.

Authors:  Anthony P Atkinson; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The categories, frequencies, and stability of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns to faces.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Putting culture under the 'spotlight' reveals universal information use for face recognition.

Authors:  Roberto Caldara; Xinyue Zhou; Sébastien Miellet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Learning optimal eye movements to unusual faces.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks.

Authors:  Matthew F Peterson; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Scan path differences and similarities during emotion perception in those with and without autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  M D Rutherford; Ashley M Towns
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2008-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.