Literature DB >> 17516021

A computer-based measure of irregularity in vertebral alignment is a BMD-independent predictor of fracture risk in postmenopausal women.

P C Pettersen1, M de Bruijne, J Chen, Q He, C Christiansen, L B Tankó.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Prevalent fracture and BMD are core elements of fracture prediction. In this control study case, we demonstrate that a simple computer-based estimation of local irregularities in the alignment of the lumbar vertebrae independently contributes to the fracture risk, thus supplementing current diagnostic tools.
INTRODUCTION: We tested the hypothesis that degree of lordosis and/or irregularity in the alignment of lumbar vertebrae could be contributors to the risk of fragility fractures.
METHODS: This was a case-control analysis including 144 elderly women; 108 maintaining skeletal integrity, whereas 36 sustaining a lumbar vertebral fracture during a 7.5-year observation period. The two groups of women were carefully matched for age, BMI, spine BMD and numerous classic risk factors. Lateral X-rays of the lumbar spine were digitized and the four corner points of endplates on each vertebra from Th12 to L5 were annotated. The degree of lordosis and irregularity of vertebral alignment was assessed by image analysis software.
RESULTS: Degree of lordosis was not predictive for fractures. In contrast, irregularity was significantly higher in those who later sustained a fracture (1.6 x 10(-2)vs. 2.0 x 10(-3) cm(-1), p < 0.001), and further increased upon a sustained fracture (2.8 x 10(-2) cm(-1), p < 0.001), but was unchanged in controls (1.6 x 10(-2) cm(-1)). The predictive value of irregularity was independent of classic risk factors of fractures, including BMD (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the herein introduced simple measure of irregularities in vertebral alignment could provide useful supplement to the currently used diagnostic tools of fracture prediction in elderly women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17516021     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0388-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  17 in total

1.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  N B Watts
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Restoring geometric and loading alignment of the thoracic spine with a vertebral compression fracture: effects of balloon (bone tamp) inflation and spinal extension.

Authors:  Ioannis N Gaitanis; Gerard Carandang; Frank M Phillips; Brian Magovern; Alexander J Ghanayem; Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Michael R Zindrick; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  When should the doctor order a spine X-ray? Identifying vertebral fractures for osteoporosis care: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

Authors:  Stephen Kaptoge; Gabi Armbrecht; Dieter Felsenberg; Mark Lunt; Terence W O'Neill; Alan J Silman; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  The long-term predictive value of bone mineral density measurements for fracture risk is independent of the site of measurement and the age at diagnosis: results from the Prospective Epidemiological Risk Factors study.

Authors:  Yu Z Bagger; László B Tankó; Peter Alexandersen; Henrik B Hansen; Gerong Qin; Claus Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  The relationship between bone mineral density and fracture risk.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  The biomechanical advantage of lordosis and hip extension for upright activity. Man as compared with other anthropoids.

Authors:  H F Farfan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Medical consequences of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Eeric Truumees
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2003

9.  Distribution of anterior cortical shear strain after a thoracic wedge compression fracture.

Authors:  Mark M Kayanja; Lisa A Ferrara; Isador H Lieberman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Vertebral dimension measurements improve prediction of vertebral fracture incidence.

Authors:  P D Ross; C Huang; J W Davis; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  1 in total

1.  Vertebral fracture risk (VFR) score for fracture prediction in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M Lillholm; A Ghosh; P C Pettersen; M de Bruijne; E B Dam; M A Karsdal; C Christiansen; H K Genant; M Nielsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.507

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.