Literature DB >> 8504371

Predicting various fragility fractures in women by forearm bone densitometry: a follow-up study.

P Gärdsell1, O Johnell, B E Nilsson, B Gullberg.   

Abstract

This is a follow-up of a previous study on the predictive power of bone mineral measurements; two more observation years have been added. A group of women (n = 1076) had their forearm bone mineral content (BMC) measured from 1970-1976. All fractures that occurred in 1975-1987 (13 years) were recorded. Four hundred sixty-nine fragility fractures occurred during the collection period. Again, it was found that BMC at the distal end of the forearm is a good predictor of future fracture before the age of 70. The measurement at the proximal site (forearm shafts), however, in contrast to our previous study, has a capacity of predicting fracture also in the age group 70-80. BMC measurements were good predictors of vertebral crush fractures and trochanteric hip fracture but lesser predictors of fractures of the distal end of the forearm. In age groups 40-70, BMC was a stronger predictor of fracture than age, and the risk associated with a 1 SD decrease of BMC 6 was 3.2 for a hip fracture as compared with those without any fragility fracture, even when adjusted for age. In addition to BMC, low body weight was a fracture predictor. Body weight 5 kg below age-adjusted mean increased the risk of a trochanteric hip fracture by 30%. The data are used in hypothetical calculations of the effects of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8504371     DOI: 10.1007/BF00310197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  8 in total

Review 1.  Screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  L J Melton; D M Eddy; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Appendicular bone density and age predict hip fracture in women. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Predicting fractures in women by using forearm bone densitometry.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The loss of bone mineral with aging and its relationship to risk of fracture.

Authors:  D M Smith; M R Khairi; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Bone mass in an urban and a rural population: a comparative, population-based study in southern Sweden.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson; I Sernbo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Baseline measurement of bone mass predicts fracture in white women.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Age and bone mass as predictors of fracture in a prospective study.

Authors:  S L Hui; C W Slemenda; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 14.808

  8 in total
  24 in total

1.  Changing perceptions in osteoporosis. Several risk factors are important.

Authors:  C W McGrother; M M Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-20

2.  MRI of bone marrow in the distal radius: in vivo precision of effective transverse relaxation times.

Authors:  S Grampp; S Majumdar; M Jergas; P Lang; A Gies; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cortical and trabecular bone at the radius and tibia in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography (pQCT) study.

Authors:  K A Szabo; C E Webber; J D Adachi; R Tozer; C Gordon; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Weight, body composition, and bone density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S S Harris; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Adami; S Ortolani; R Wasnich
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Jönsson; C Christiansen; O Johnell; J Hedbrandt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Predicting the failure load of the distal radius.

Authors:  Monique E Muller; Colin E Webber; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Calcaneal BMD Obtained by Dual X-Ray and Laser Predicts Future Hip Fractures-A Prospective Study on 4 398 Swedish Women.

Authors:  Torkel B Brismar; Imre Janszky; L I M Toft
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-10

10.  Bone mineral density predicts non-spine fractures in very elderly women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  M C Nevitt; O Johnell; D M Black; K Ensrud; H K Genant; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.