Literature DB >> 16240830

The effects of high presentation levels on consonant feature transmission.

Benjamin W Y Hornsby1, Timothy D Trine, Ralph N Ohde.   

Abstract

The effect of high speech presentation levels on consonant recognition and feature transmission was assessed in eight participants with normal hearing. Consonant recognition in noise (0 dB signal-to-noise ratio) was measured at five overall speech levels ranging from 65 to 100 dB SPL. Consistent with the work of others, overall percent correct performance decreased as the presentation level of speech increased [e.g., G. A. Studebaker, R. L. Sherbecoe, D. M. McDaniel, and C. A. Gwaltney, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(4), 2431-2444 (1999)]. Confusion matrices were analyzed in terms of relative percent information transmitted at each speech presentation level, as a function of feature. Six feature sets (voicing, place, nasality, duration, frication, and sonorance) were analyzed. Results showed the feature duration (long consonant duration fricatives) to be most affected by increases in level, while the voicing feature was relatively unaffected by increases in level. In addition, alveolar consonants were substantially affected by level, while palatal consonants were not. While the underlying mechanisms responsible for decreases in performance with level increases are unclear, an analysis of common error patterns at high levels suggests that saturation of the neural response and/or a loss of neural synchrony may play a role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240830     DOI: 10.1121/1.1993128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Tina M Penman; Sun Mi Gille
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13

2.  Level-dependent changes in perception of speech envelope cues.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Xin Wang; Amy R Horwitz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-08

3.  Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Earl E Johnson; Erin Picou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Tina M Penman; Garnett P McMillan; Emily M Ellis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The effect of presentation level on spectral weights for sentences.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Reference-Free Assessment of Speech Intelligibility Using Bispectrum of an Auditory Neurogram.

Authors:  Mohammad E Hossain; Wissam A Jassim; Muhammad S A Zilany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech.

Authors:  Alex G Armstrong; Chi Chung Lam; Shievanie Sabesan; Nicholas A Lesica
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 29.234

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.