Literature DB >> 16240450

Detection of prostate carcinoma with contrast-enhanced sonography using intermittent harmonic imaging.

Ethan J Halpern1, John R Ramey, Stephen E Strup, Ferdinand Frauscher, Peter McCue, Leonard G Gomella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess prostate carcinoma detection and discrimination of benign from malignant prostate tissue with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
METHODS: In all, 301 subjects referred for prostate biopsy were evaluated with contrast-enhanced sonography using continuous harmonic imaging (CHI) and intermittent harmonic imaging (IHI) with interscan delay times of 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 seconds, as well as continuous color and power Doppler. Targeted biopsy cores were obtained from sites of greatest enhancement, followed by spatially distributed cores in a modified sextant distribution.
RESULTS: Carcinoma was detected in 363 biopsy cores from 104 of 301 subjects (35%). Carcinoma was found in 15.5% (175 of 1133) of targeted cores and 10.4% (188 of 1806) of sextant cores (P < 0.01). Among subjects with carcinoma, targeted cores were twice as likely to be positive (odds ratio [OR] = 2.0, P < 0.001). Clustered receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of imaging findings at sextant biopsy sites yielded the following Az values: precontrast gray scale: 0.58; precontrast color Doppler: 0.53; precontrast power Doppler: 0.58; CHI: 0.62; IHI (0.2 sec): 0.64; IHI (0.5 sec): 0.63; IHI (1.0 sec): 0.65; IHI (2.0 sec): 0.61; contrast-enhanced color Doppler: 0.60; contrast-enhanced power Doppler: 0.62. A statistically significant benefit was found for IHI over baseline imaging (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The carcinoma detection rate of contrast-enhanced targeted cores is significantly higher when compared with sextant cores. Contrast-enhanced transrectal sonography with IHI provides a statistically significant improvement in discrimination between benign and malignant biopsy sites. However, given the relatively low ROC areas, this technique may not be sufficient to predict which patients have benign versus malignant disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16240450     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  40 in total

1.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ethan J Halpern
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

2.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 3.  Imaging angiogenesis of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Ying-Kiat Zee; James P B O'Connor; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson; Andrew R Clamp; M Ben Taylor; Noel W Clarke; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Ultrasonography in prostate cancer: current roles and potential applications in radiorecurrent disease.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad; Stephen J Savage
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  [Innovative imaging in urology: fascination and future. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow].

Authors:  T Loch; G Schneider
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Urologic imaging for localized prostate cancer in 2007.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Saturation biopsies for prostate cancer: current uses and future prospects.

Authors:  Nicolas B Delongchamps; Gabriel P Haas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Ultrasound of the prostate.

Authors:  Michael Mitterberger; Wolfgang Horninger; Friedrich Aigner; Germar M Pinggera; Ilona Steppan; Peter Rehder; Ferdinand Frauscher
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 9.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 14.432

10.  Prostate cancer detection with real-time elastography using a bi-plane transducer: comparison with step section radical prostatectomy pathology.

Authors:  Yunkai Zhu; Yaqing Chen; Tingyue Qi; Jun Jiang; Jun Qi; Yongjiang Yu; Xiaohong Yao; Wenbin Guan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.