Literature DB >> 17375307

Urologic imaging for localized prostate cancer in 2007.

Tillmann Loch1.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of systematic random biopsies have virtually replaced urologic imaging as a detection and staging tool in prostate cancer. TRUS as the most commonly utilized urologic imaging is now mainly utilized to guide the biopsy needle into the correct anatomical or topographic region of the prostate. But even multiple systematic random biopsies have been shown to overlook a large number of clinically significant carcinoma. This fact has led to a dramatic increase in the number of biopsies taken in the detection of localized prostate cancer. There are some centers where 6, 10, 12, even up to 143 biopsies are taken in one sitting. This increasingly invasive and heterogeneous strategy underlines the need for an improvement in diagnostic imaging. New modalities and innovative techniques are currently being investigated in order to identify prostate cancer more accurately. The purpose of this paper is to review innovative urologic imaging techniques to identify emerging modalities that may be beneficial in the management of prostate cancer. Enhanced transrectal ultrasonography modalities, including ultrasound contrast agents, color and power doppler, elastography and computerized (C)-TRUS with artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) promise benefits in comparison to standard gray-scale ultrasonography to accurately target and diagnose prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17375307     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-007-0155-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  21 in total

Review 1.  Nonlinear acoustics in diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  Francis A Duck
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Role of advanced 2 and 3-dimensional ultrasound for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  K C Balaji; William R Fair; Ernst J Feleppa; Christopher R Porter; Harold Tsai; Tian Liu; Andrew Kalisz; Stella Urban; John Gillespie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  Katharina König; Ulrich Scheipers; Andreas Pesavento; Andreas Lorenz; Helmut Ermert; Theodor Senge
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Origin and development of carcinoma in the prostate.

Authors:  J E McNeal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  T Loch; I Leuschner; C Genberg; K Weichert-Jacobsen; F Küppers; E Yfantis; M Evans; V Tsarev; M Stöckle
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: random sextant versus biopsies of sono-morphologically suspicious lesions.

Authors:  Tillmann Loch; Ursula Eppelmann; Jan Lehmann; Bernd Wullich; Annemie Loch; Michael Stöckle
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer.

Authors:  M Norberg; L Egevad; L Holmberg; P Sparén; B J Norlén; C Busch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  [Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].

Authors:  T Loch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Parasagittal biopsies add minimal information in repeat saturation prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; J Stephen Jones; John Rabets; Gerard DeOreo; Craig D Zippe
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate.

Authors:  K K Hodge; J E McNeal; M K Terris; T A Stamey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Towards ultrasound probe positioning optimization during prostate needle biopsy using pressure feedback.

Authors:  Seyed Reza Mousavi; Kaamran Raahemifar; Stephen Pautler; Abbas Samani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU).

Authors:  Pasquale Martino; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Paolo Consonni; Carlo Trombetta; Silvano Palazzo; Carmen Maccagnano; Giovanni Liguori; Massimo Valentino; Michele Battaglia; Libero Barozzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C J Harvey; J Pilcher; J Richenberg; U Patel; F Frauscher
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prostate cancer prediction using the random forest algorithm that takes into account transrectal ultrasound findings, age, and serum levels of prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Li-Hong Xiao; Pei-Ran Chen; Zhong-Ping Gou; Yong-Zhong Li; Mei Li; Liang-Cheng Xiang; Ping Feng
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Focal therapy for prostate cancer: revolution or evolution?

Authors:  Ryan Turpen; Charles J Rosser
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.264

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.