| Literature DB >> 16932839 |
Abstract
In contrast to other countries (e.g., USA) the German urologist routinely utilizes imaging in order to evaluate urological disorders. Ultrasound as a basic tool has acquired importance similar to the physical examination or the patient history. Because of its minimal invasiveness and low cost, it is increasingly utilized as a first-line exam.In correlation with the patient history and laboratory data more invasive imaging studies are performed and in unclear cases or in the preoperative work-up more extensive imaging procedures like computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are utilized. Even in emergency situations the urologist is able to guide interventions under ultrasound or conventional X-ray guidance (e.g., percutaneous drainage of dilated kidney), which resulted in a much lower complication rate of the various procedures. In those cases in which ultrasound is technically infeasible or in unclear cases CT and MRI are used as problem-solving procedures and are able to give the correct diagnosis in a large percentage of cases.After a brief historical overview, newer modalities and innovative techniques are explored and presented. Assuming that these innovative approaches lead to more accurate diagnosis and staging of various neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions, treatment can be performed in earlier stages of diseases and better stage-adapted treatment can be offered to the patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16932839 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-006-1135-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urologe A ISSN: 0340-2592 Impact factor: 0.639