Literature DB >> 3612237

Sinusoidal movement of a grating across the monkey's fingerpad: temporal patterns of afferent fiber responses.

J W Morley, A W Goodwin.   

Abstract

Responses were recorded from cutaneous afferents innervating mechanoreceptors in the monkey's fingerpad, while gratings of alternating grooves and ridges were moved sinusoidally across their receptive fields. The gratings were specified by their spatial period and the movement by its peak speed: together these determined the peak temporal frequency at which grating ridges passed over the receptive field. During the central 42 degrees of each half cycle of movement, the speed and thus the temporal frequency of the grating ridges remained constant to within 6.6% of their peak values. In this region the responses of all afferents were phase-locked to the temporal sequence of grating ridges. The number of impulses elicited by each grating ridge was a function of the stimulus variables. For all 3 afferent classes--namely, slowly adapting afferents (SAs), rapidly adapting afferents (RAs), and Pacinian afferents (PCs)--the number of impulses per grating ridge increased as the spatial period of the grating increased (while the peak speed of movement was held constant). Similarly, for all 3 classes, the number of impulses per ridge decreased as the peak speed of movement increased (while the spatial period of the grating remained constant). When the peak temporal frequency of the grating ridges was held constant, for SAs and RAs the number of impulses per ridge increased with an increase in the spatial period of the grating and thus with an increase in the peak speed. These phase-locked responses provided information about the peak temporal frequency of the grating ridges independent of the grating spatial period and of the peak speed of movement. The shape of the response profile during a half cycle of movement was different for different afferents. Many of the RA response profiles were close to sinusoidal. The SA and PC profiles tended to have reduced peaks or raised troughs, resulting in flatter profiles. Other departures from sinusoidal profiles were also seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3612237      PMCID: PMC6568946     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

1.  Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Authors:  C J Cascio; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Tactile attention and the perception of moving tactile stimuli.

Authors:  P M Evans; J C Craig
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-04

4.  The tactile speed aftereffect depends on the speed of adapting motion across the skin rather than other spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  SA1 and RA afferent responses to static and vibrating gratings.

Authors:  S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; T Yoshioka; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Skin profiles during sinusoidal vibration of the fingerpad.

Authors:  A W Goodwin; K T John; I Darian-Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Texture perception through direct and indirect touch: an analysis of perceptual space for tactile textures in two modes of exploration.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; S J Bensmaïa; J C Craig; S S Hsiao
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2007 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Spatio-temporal skin strain distributions evoke low variability spike responses in cuneate neurons.

Authors:  Vincent Hayward; Alexander V Terekhov; Sheng-Chao Wong; Pontus Geborek; Fredrik Bengtsson; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.118

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.