Literature DB >> 3209773

Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch.

S J Bolanowski1, G A Gescheider, R T Verrillo, C M Checkosky.   

Abstract

Although previous physiological and anatomical experiments have identified four afferent fiber types (PC, RA, SA II, and SA I) in glabrous (nonhairy) skin of the human somatosensory periphery, only three have been shown to mediate tactile (mechanoreceptive) sensation. Psychophysical evidence that four channels (P, NP I, NP II, and NP III) do, indeed, participate in the perceptual process is presented. In a series of experiments involving selective masking of the various channels, modification of the skin-surface temperature, and testing cutaneous sensitivity down to very low-vibratory frequencies, the fourth psychophysical channel (NP III) is defined. Based on these experiments and previous work from our laboratory, it is concluded that the four channels work in conjunction at threshold to create an operating range for the perception of vibration that extends from at least 0.4 to greater than 500 Hz. Each of the four channels appears to mediate specific portions of the overall threshold-frequency characteristic. Selection of appropriate neural-response criteria from previously published physiological data and correlation of their derived frequency characteristics with the four psychophysical channels indicates that each channel has its own physiological substrate: P channel and PC fibers, NP I channel and RA fibers, NP II channel and SA II fibers, and NP III channel and SA I fibers. These channels partially overlap in their absolute sensitivities, making it likely that suprathreshold stimuli may activate two or more of the channels at the same time. Thus the perceptual qualities of touch may be determined by the combined inputs from four channels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3209773     DOI: 10.1121/1.397184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  91 in total

1.  Neuronal correlates of sensory discrimination in the somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  A Hernández; A Zainos; R Romo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Movement-related modulation of vibrotactile detection thresholds in the human orofacial system.

Authors:  Richard D Andreatta; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The vibrations of texture.

Authors:  Sliman J BensmaIa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  End-to-end linkage (EEL) clustering algorithm: a study on the distribution of Meissner corpuscles in the skin.

Authors:  Burak Güçlü; Stanley J Bolanowski; Lorraine Pawson
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Modeling population responses of rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptive fibers.

Authors:  Burak Güçlü; Stanley J Bolanowski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Modality maps within primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Robert M Friedman; Li Min Chen; Anna Wang Roe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tristate markov model for the firing statistics of rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptive fibers.

Authors:  Burak Güçlü; Stanley J Bolanowski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

8.  The influence of spatial contrast on the frequency-dependent nature of vibration sensitivity.

Authors:  H Muijser
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

9.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face.

Authors:  M Hollins; K A Delemos; A K Goble
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-01

10.  Effects of feedback from active and passive body parts on spatial and temporal parameters in sensorimotor synchronization.

Authors:  Peter E Keller; Masami Ishihara; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.