Literature DB >> 16227892

The fusion rate of calcium sulfate with local autograft bone compared with autologous iliac bone graft for instrumented short-segment spinal fusion.

Wen-Jer Chen1, Tsung-Ting Tsai, Lih-Huei Chen, Chi-Chien Niu, Po-Liang Lai, Tsai-Sheng Fu, Kevin McCarthy.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of calcium sulfate pellets plus laminectomy bone chips with a fresh autologous iliac bone graft for short-segment lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Bone graft substitute material can be used to expand an existing quantity of available laminectomy bone chips.
METHODS: Seventy-four patients underwent surgery for instrumented one- or two-segment fusion with decompression. Autologous iliac crest bone graft was placed in one posterolateral gutter, while on the other side, an equal quantity of autogenous laminectomy bone supplemented with calcium sulfate was placed. Radiographic assessment included radiographs alone; this was performed every 3 months (3 months to 12 months), then annually. The status of fusion and the relative size of the fusion bone mass on either side of the vertebra were compared.
RESULTS: Using iliac crest bone graft (control side) versus autograft laminectomy bone with calcium sulfate (test side), there was no significant difference between the fusion rate and sizes of the fusion bone mass (P > 0.05). Follow-up periods ranged from 30 months to 34 months, averaging 32.5 months. For the 39 patients who received single-segment fusion, 34 patients (87.2%) exhibited bone fusion on the test side, and 35 patients (89.7%) had evidence of fusion on the control side. For the 35 patients who received two-segment fusion, 29 patients (82.9%) exhibited bone fusion on the test side and 30 patients (85.7%) demonstrated complete fusion on the control side.
CONCLUSIONS: The fusion rate and fusion size between the two groups are similar. Calcium sulfate pellets may play a role as a bone graft extender in short-segment spinal fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16227892     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000182087.35335.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Stefanie M Shiels; Lauren A Boller; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Authors:  Ashim Gupta; Nitin Kukkar; Kevin Sharif; Benjamin J Main; Christine E Albers; Saadiq F El-Amin Iii
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-07-18

4.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of bioactive glass in posterior cervical and lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Théo Broussolle
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-24

5.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Clinical outcomes of treatment with cage-shaped demineralized bone plus local bone grafts vs. autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in instrumented single-level lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chen-Guang Zhao; Jie Qin; Xin Wang; Gang Xu; Yong Jia; Yu-Cheng Guan; Xiang Mou; Hua Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 7.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Posterior instrumentation with transpedicular calcium sulphate graft for thoracolumbar burst fracture.

Authors:  Jen-Chung Liao; Kuo-Fong Fan; Wen-Jer Chen; Lih-Huei Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michaela Gstöttner; Conrad Kobel; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Influence of 45S5 Bioactive Glass in A Standard Calcium Phosphate Collagen Bone Graft Substitute on the Posterolateral Fusion of Rabbit Spine.

Authors:  Andrew J Pugely; Emily B Petersen; Nicole DeVries-Watson; Douglas C Fredericks
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.