Literature DB >> 26191491

Bone graft substitutes for spine fusion: A brief review.

Ashim Gupta1, Nitin Kukkar1, Kevin Sharif1, Benjamin J Main1, Christine E Albers1, Saadiq F El-Amin Iii1.   

Abstract

Bone graft substitutes are widely used in the field of orthopedics and are extensively used to promote vertebral fusion. Fusion is the most common technique in spine surgery and is used to treat morbidities and relieve discomfort. Allograft and autograft bone substitutes are currently the most commonly used bone grafts to promote fusion. These approaches pose limitations and present complications to the patient. Numerous alternative bone graft substitutes are on the market or have been developed and proposed for application. These options have attempted to promote spine fusion by enhancing osteogenic properties. In this review, we reviewed biology of spine fusion and the current advances in biomedical materials and biological strategies for application in surgical spine fusion. Our findings illustrate that, while many bone graft substitutes perform well as bone graft extenders, only osteoinductive proteins (recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and osteogenic protein-1) provide evidence for use as both bone enhancers and bone substitutes for specific types of spinal fusion. Tissue engineered hydrogels, synthetic polymer composites and viral based gene therapy also holds the potential to be used for spine fusion in future, though warrants further investigation to be used in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allograft; Autograft; Bone enhancers; Bone graft substitutes; Spine fusion

Year:  2015        PMID: 26191491      PMCID: PMC4501930          DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i6.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Orthop        ISSN: 2218-5836


  85 in total

1.  Adenoviral delivery of LIM mineralization protein-1 induces new-bone formation in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M Viggeswarapu; S D Boden; Y Liu; G A Hair; J Louis-Ugbo; H Murakami; H S Kim; M T Mayr; W C Hutton; L Titus
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Scott D Boden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Bone formation in implants of partially and wholly demineralized bone matrix. Including observations on acetone-fixed intra and extracellular proteins.

Authors:  M R Urist; B S Strates
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  Lisa B E Shields; George H Raque; Steven D Glassman; Mitchell Campbell; Todd Vitaz; John Harpring; Christopher B Shields
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  In vivo molecular imaging of adenoviral versus lentiviral gene therapy in two bone formation models.

Authors:  Brian T Feeley; Augustine H Conduah; Osamu Sugiyama; Lucie Krenek; Irvin S Y Chen; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process spine arthrodesis with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2/hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate after laminectomy in the nonhuman primate.

Authors:  S D Boden; G J Martin; M A Morone; J L Ugbo; P A Moskovitz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Autograft versus allograft in degenerative cervical disease.

Authors:  Kelly M Malloy; Alan S Hilibrand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Percutaneous spinal fusion using bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene therapy.

Authors:  T D Alden; D D Pittman; E J Beres; G R Hankins; D F Kallmes; B M Wisotsky; K M Kerns; G A Helm
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Use of bone morphogenetic protein-9 gene therapy to induce spinal arthrodesis in the rodent.

Authors:  G A Helm; T D Alden; E J Beres; S B Hudson; S Das; J A Engh; D D Pittman; K M Kerns; D F Kallmes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Effect of regional gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2-producing bone marrow cells on spinal fusion in rats.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Wang; Linda E A Kanim; Stephen Yoo; Patricia A Campbell; Arnold J Berk; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  An evaluation of biomaterials and osteobiologics for arthrodesis achievement in spine surgery.

Authors:  Joon S Yoo; Junyoung Ahn; Dillon S Patel; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 2.  New Strategies in Enhancing Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Karim Shafi; Chelsie Jacques; Sohrab Virk; Sravisht Iyer; Matthew Cunningham
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-02

3.  Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew T Morris; Sandip P Tarpada; Woojin Cho
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

5.  Bovine-derived xenograft is a viable bone graft substitute in multilevel, instrumented, spinal fusion.

Authors:  Max Prost; Jochaim Windolf; Markus Rafael Konieczny
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25

6.  Biofabrication of 3D printed hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Yoontae Kim; Eun-Jin Lee; Albert V Davydov; Stanislav Frukhtbeyen; Jonathan E Seppala; Shozo Takagi; Laurence Chow; Stella Alimperti
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.715

7.  Tissue Engineered Bone Differentiated From Human Adipose Derived Stem Cells Inhibit Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Comron Saifi; Jonathan Bernhard; Jamal N Shillingford; Petros Petridis; Samuel Robinson; X Edward Guo; Mark Weidenbaum; Ronald A Lehman; Howard S An; Lawrence G Lenke; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic; Joseph L Laratta
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 8.  3D Printing Applications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Megan R Hsu; Meraaj S Haleem; Wellington Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-01

Review 9.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management.

Authors:  Gabriel Fernandez de Grado; Laetitia Keller; Ysia Idoux-Gillet; Quentin Wagner; Anne-Marie Musset; Nadia Benkirane-Jessel; Fabien Bornert; Damien Offner
Journal:  J Tissue Eng       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 7.813

10.  Biological Evaluation of Flexible Polyurethane/Poly l-Lactic Acid Composite Scaffold as a Potential Filler for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yuk Fai Lui; Wing Yuk Ip
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.