Literature DB >> 31853316

Clinical outcomes of treatment with cage-shaped demineralized bone plus local bone grafts vs. autogenous iliac crest bone grafts in instrumented single-level lumbar fusion: A retrospective cohort study.

Chen-Guang Zhao1, Jie Qin2, Xin Wang3, Gang Xu4, Yong Jia4, Yu-Cheng Guan4, Xiang Mou1, Hua Yuan1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of cage-shaped demineralized bone plus local bone grafts (CDBLG) with those of autogenous iliac crest bone grafts (ICBG) implanted for the treatment of single-level lumbar intervertebral disc degenerative diseases. A total of 69 cases of degenerative spinal disorder treated between January 2011 and December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, 44 were treated with CDBLG and 25 with autogenous ICBG. All fusions were instrumented single level. Fusion was assessed after 6, 12 and 24 months by X-ray and CT scans post-operatively. Clinical outcomes were determined during follow-up and assessments included the Oswestry Disability Index, Visual Analogue Scale for back and leg pain and the Short Form-36 general health survey physical component summary. The results indicated that the overall fusion rate at 24 months post-operatively was higher in the ICBG group compared with that in the CDBLG group, although not significantly (P>0.05). All other outcome measures were significantly improved in the two groups after the surgery (P<0.05), but no significant differences were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). Blood loss and mean duration of surgery in the CDBLG group were significantly lower compared with those in the ICBG group (P<0.05). In conclusion, CDBLG achieved a similar fusion rate and clinical outcome as ICBG but was associated with significantly reduced blood loss and mean duration of surgery. In conclusion, the present study provided CDBLG bone graft as an alternative option for single-level fusion.
Copyright © 2019, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cage-shaped demineralized bone graft and local bone; degenerative spine; iliac crest bone graft; lumbar fusion

Year:  2019        PMID: 31853316      PMCID: PMC6909787          DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.8171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Ther Med        ISSN: 1792-0981            Impact factor:   2.447


  38 in total

Review 1.  The biology of bone grafting.

Authors:  Safdar N Khan; Frank P Cammisa; Harvinder S Sandhu; Ashish D Diwan; Federico P Girardi; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  CT evaluation of lumbar interbody fusion: current concepts.

Authors:  Alan L Williams; Matthew F Gornet; J Kenneth Burkus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Dual-purpose bone grafts improve healing and reduce infection.

Authors:  Scott A Guelcher; Kate V Brown; Bing Li; Teja Guda; Baek-Hee Lee; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman; Mladen Djurasovic
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Allograft versus autograft in cervical and lumbar spinal fusions: an examination of operative time, length of stay, surgical site infection, and blood transfusions.

Authors:  Meghan E Murphy; Brandon A Mccutcheon; Jennifer Grauberger; Daniel Shepherd; Patrick R Maloney; Lorenzo Rinaldo; Panagiotis Kerezoudis; Jeremy L Fogelson; Ahmad Nassr; Mohamad Bydon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  The fusion rate of calcium sulfate with local autograft bone compared with autologous iliac bone graft for instrumented short-segment spinal fusion.

Authors:  Wen-Jer Chen; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu; Po-Liang Lai; Tsai-Sheng Fu; Kevin McCarthy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Comparison of Allograft and Autograft in Lumbar Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhong Liao; Chao-Hui Wang; Wei-Liang Cui
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 8.  Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Casey K Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Two-year fusion rate equivalency between Grafton DBM gel and autograft in posterolateral spine fusion: a prospective controlled trial employing a side-by-side comparison in the same patient.

Authors:  Frank P Cammisa; Gary Lowery; Steven R Garfin; Fred H Geisler; Peter M Klara; Robert A McGuire; Walter R Sassard; Harrison Stubbs; Jon E Block
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Clinical comparison between a percutaneous hydraulic pressure delivery system and balloon tamp system using high-viscosity cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Jie Qin; Jianjun Li; Ying Liu; Bo Zhao; Hui Dong; Bo Dong; Rui Zhang; Ning Ning; Xin Zhang; Feng Cui; Haopeng Li; Xijing He; Dong Wang
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.