Literature DB >> 16222529

A preliminary study of reliability of impedance measurement to detect iatrogenic initial pedicle perforation (in the porcine model).

Ciaran Bolger1, C Carozzo, T Roger, Linda McEvoy, Jabir Nagaria, Gerard Vanacker, Maurice Bourlion.   

Abstract

Accidental perforation of the vertebral pedicle wall is a well-known complication associated with standard approach of pedicle screw insertion. Depending on detection criteria, more than 20% of screws are reported misplaced. Serious clinical consequences, from dysesthesia to paraplegia, although not common, may result from these misplaced screws. Many techniques have been described to address this issue such as somatosensory evoked potentials, electromyography, surgical navigation, etc. Each of these techniques presents advantages and drawbacks, none is simple and ergonomic. A new drilling tool was evaluated which allows for instant detection of pedicle perforation by emission of variable beeps. This new device is based on two original principles: the device is integrated in the drilling or screwing tool, the technology allows real-time detection of perforation through two independent parameters, impedance variation and evoked muscular contractions. A preliminary animal study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of this system based upon electrical conductivity. A total of 168 manual pedicle drillings followed by insertion of implants were performed in 11 young porcine lumbar and thoracic spines. The presence or absence of perforation detection, which defines the reliability of the device, was correlated with necropsic examination of the spines. Using this protocol the device demonstrated 100% positive predictive value, 96% negative predictive value, 100% specificity, and 97% sensitivity. Of 168 drillings there were three (1.79%) false-negatives, leading to a minor effraction, cranially in the intervertebral disks, nine (5.36%) screw threads breaching the vertebral cortex when inserting screws, although preparation of the holes did not indicate any perforation, 34 (36%) breaches detected by the instrument and not detected by the surgeon. These results confirm that the impedance variation detection capability of this device offers a simple and effective means to detect perforation in vertebral pedicle, prior to insertion of pedicle screws. Due to the porcine nerve root anatomy, it was not possible to evaluate the added benefit of cross-linking impedance and EMG detection. A future clinical study may further explore the subject of current study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16222529      PMCID: PMC3489289          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1024-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of pedicle screw position in thoracic and lumbar spine fixation using plain radiographs and computed tomography. A prospective study of 35 patients.

Authors:  G S Sapkas; S A Papadakis; D P Stathakopoulos; P J Papagelopoulos; A C Badekas; J H Kaiser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Complications of the variable screw plate pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  J L West; J W Ogilvie; D S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; K Takata; V Goel; D Federico; T Oxland; J Duranceau; M Krag
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S J Rizzolo; R A Balderston; T J Allardyce; S R Garfin; C Dolinskas; H S An
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U R Liljenqvist; H F Halm; T M Link
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis.

Authors:  N D Glossop; R W Hu; J A Randle
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Anatomic considerations of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique.

Authors:  R Xu; N A Ebraheim; Y Ou; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members.

Authors:  S I Esses; B L Sachs; V Dreyzin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Complications of lumbar spinal fusion with transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  S H Davne; D L Myers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Evaluation with evoked and spontaneous electromyography during lumbar instrumentation: a prospective study.

Authors:  W C Welch; R D Rose; J R Balzer; G B Jacobs
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  12 in total

1.  Triggered electromyography for placement of thoracic pedicle screws: is it reliable?

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Mark Tantorski; Patrick J Cahill; Ashish Ranade; Stephen Koch; David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Jahangir Asghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Monitoring reduced scattering coefficient in pedicle screw insertion trajectory using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Weitao Li; Yangyang Liu; Haixiang Sun; Yue Pan; Zhiyu Qian
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Electrical conductivity measurement: a new technique to detect iatrogenic initial pedicle perforation.

Authors:  Ciaran Bolger; Michael O Kelleher; Linda McEvoy; M Brayda-Bruno; A Kaelin; J-Y Lazennec; J-C Le Huec; C Logroscino; P Mata; P Moreta; G Saillant; R Zeller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Accuracy of a dynamic surgical guidance probe for screw insertion in the cervical spine: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Daniel Dixon; Bruce Darden; Jose Casamitjana; Karen A Weissmann; San Cristobal; David Powell; Daniel Baluch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Erratum: A novel probe for measuring tissue bioelectrical impedance to enhance pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Zheng Li; Chong Chen; Youxi Lin; Xingye Li; Haining Tan; Matthew Tv Chan; William Kk Wu; Songtao Zhan; Qun Cao; Jianxiong Shen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

6.  Feasibility of Endoscopic Inspection of Pedicle Wall Integrity in a Live Surgery Model.

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Harvey Smith; Bobby Kalantar; Robert Isaacs; Barrett Woods; Alexander R Vaccaro; James Brannon
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Power-Tool Use in Orthopaedic Surgery: Iatrogenic Injury, Its Detection, and Technological Advances: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew C A Arnold; Sarah Zhao; Ruben J Doyle; Jonathan R T Jeffers; Oliver R Boughton
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-11-19

8.  Usefulness of navigated O-arm(®) in a teaching center for spinal trauma.

Authors:  Deepak Agrawal
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

9.  Control of Pedicle Screw Placement with an Electrical Conductivity Measurement Device: Initial Evaluation in the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Olaf Suess; Markus Schomacher
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2016-09-06

10.  Improved Accuracy and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement by Using a Probe with an Electrical Conductivity-Measuring Device during Severe Syndromic and Neuromuscular Scoliosis Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Yurube; Yutaro Kanda; Masaaki Ito; Yoshiki Takeoka; Teppei Suzuki; Koki Uno; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kenichiro Kakutani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.