Literature DB >> 5942033

Mechanical transmission in a Pacinian corpuscle. An analysis and a theory.

W R Loewenstein, R Skalak.   

Abstract

1. An analysis is made of the transmission of mechanical forces through the Pacinian corpuscle. In particular, forces are analysed which produce pressure differences at the centre of the corpuscle and lead to excitation of the sensory nerve ending.2. The main structural elements in force transmission through the corpuscle are the lamellae, their interconnexions, and the interlamellar fluid. The two former provide the elastic elements and constraint for the fluid; and the latter, the viscous elements. The mechanical equivalent incorporating these elements is a system of dashpots (the lamellar surfaces and the interlamellar fluid) and springs (the lamellae and their interconnexions); it is a mechanical filter which suppresses low frequencies. The dynamic and static patterns of lamella displacements in the equivalent are in close agreement with those observed in Pacinian corpuscles.3. Steady-state and transient pressure fields were determined for the equivalent. Under static compression, only elastic forces exist in the corpuscle. Analysis shows that such forces are transmitted poorly from periphery to centre through the lamellated structure. The compliance of the lamellar interconnexions is so high in relation to that of the lamellae themselves, that most of the pressure load is carried by the outer lamellae. As a result, only a small fraction of the steady-state pressure at the outer surface reaches the centre of the corpuscle where the sensory ending is located. This is the mechanical basis of receptor adaptation.4. Under dynamic compression, viscous forces develop in the corpuscle; and these account for most of the pressure at times too early for development of elastic deformations. Analysis shows that such forces are transmitted well. For example, if a typical corpuscle of 500mu diameter is compressed by 20mu linearly during 2 msec, the pressure differences near to the centre of the corpuscle are initially as high as at the periphery, and stay within the same order throughout the process of compression. In general, pressure at the centre increases steeply with velocity of compression. This explains the marked velocity dependence of the generator response of the sensory ending.If, in the foregoing example, the 20mu compression is held fixed after 2 msec, the pressure differences at the centre fall abruptly to near zero with the onset of the static phase. The duration of pressure transients at the centre approximates that of the ;active' phase of the generator current of the sensory ending derived from experiments, as expected in a causal relationship: pressure difference --> generator current. Taken together with the earlier experimental finding of marked prolongation of generator response in corpuscles partially stripped of lamellae (Loewenstein & Mendelson, 1965), this result warrants the conclusion that the mechanical filter action of the corpuscle is the rate-limiting factor in generator response adaptation.5. When the corpuscle is released from compression, energy stored in the elastic elements during compression is released and consumed in viscous flow. Thus, viscous pressure is produced anew. The magnitude of this pressure depends on the velocity of release. The pressure distribution is rotated by 90 degrees with respect to that in compression; i.e. during release, compression occurs once again, but this time at right angles to the direction of initial compression. Experiments show that the sensory ending does not discriminate such a rotation; the polarity and order of magnitude of the generator response to compression in one plane are the same as in another. Analysis shows that considerable pressure differences may be developed at the centre of the corpuscle during releases at physiological velocities. For instance, in a passive return from a compression of 20mu, the pressure difference at the centre (and the generator current) is of the same order of magnitude as that in a compression of the velocity in 4. This accounts for the ;off'-response of the sensory ending in purely mechanical terms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1966        PMID: 5942033      PMCID: PMC1357475          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  20 in total

1.  ADAPTATION IN STRETCH RECEPTOR NEURONS OF CRAYFISH.

Authors:  S NAKAJIMA
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  COMPONENTS OF RECEPTOR ADAPTATION IN A PACINIAN CORPUSCLE.

Authors:  W R LOEWENSTEIN; M MENDELSON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  New observations on the structure of the Pacinian corpuscle and its relation to the perineural epithelium of peripheral nerves.

Authors:  T R SHANTHAVEERAPPA; G H BOURNE
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1963-01

4.  Mechanisms of nerve impulse initiation in a pressure receptor (Lorenzinian ampulla).

Authors:  W R LOEWENSTEIN
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1960-12-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The initiation of action potentials at Pacinian corpuscles.

Authors:  R ALVAREZ BUYLLA; J REMOLINA
Journal:  Acta Physiol Lat Am       Date:  1959

6.  The generation of electric activity in a nerve ending.

Authors:  W R LOEWENSTEIN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1959-08-28       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The relation between receptor potentials and the concentration of sodium ions.

Authors:  J DIAMOND; J A GRAY; D R INMAN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1958-07-14       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Properties of the receptor potential in Pacinian corpuscles.

Authors:  J A GRAY; M SATO
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1953-12-29       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Electron microscopy of the pacinian corpuscle.

Authors:  D C PEASE; T A QUILLIAM
Journal:  J Biophys Biochem Cytol       Date:  1957-05-25

10.  Generator processes of repetitive activity in a pacinian corpuscle.

Authors:  W R LOEWENSTEIN
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1958-03-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  52 in total

1.  Tristate markov model for the firing statistics of rapidly-adapting mechanoreceptive fibers.

Authors:  Burak Güçlü; Stanley J Bolanowski
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Tissue mechanics govern the rapidly adapting and symmetrical response to touch.

Authors:  Amy L Eastwood; Alessandro Sanzeni; Bryan C Petzold; Sung-Jin Park; Massimo Vergassola; Beth L Pruitt; Miriam B Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Transduction of Repetitive Mechanical Stimuli by Piezo1 and Piezo2 Ion Channels.

Authors:  Amanda H Lewis; Alisa F Cui; Malcolm F McDonald; Jörg Grandl
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Time-course of vibratory adaptation and recovery in cutaneous mechanoreceptive afferents.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; S J Bensmaïa; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Mechanosensitive currents in the neurites of cultured mouse sensory neurones.

Authors:  Jing Hu; Gary R Lewin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Behavior of solutions of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations and its relation to properties of mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  I Nemoto; S Miyazaki; M Saito; T Utsunomiya
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  GABAergic/glutamatergic-glial/neuronal interaction contributes to rapid adaptation in pacinian corpuscles.

Authors:  Lorraine Pawson; Laura T Prestia; Greer K Mahoney; Burak Güçlü; Philip J Cox; Adam K Pack
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Cutaneous afferent innervation of the human foot sole: what can we learn from single-unit recordings?

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Ryan M Peters; J Timothy Inglis; Leah R Bent
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sensory adaptation to electrical stimulation of the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Emily L Graczyk; Benoit P Delhaye; Matthew A Schiefer; Sliman J Bensmaia; Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  The Bezold reflex: a special case of the left ventricular mechanoreceptor reflex.

Authors:  J A Estrin; R W Emery; J J Leonard; D M Nicoloff; C R Swayze; J J Buckley; I J Fox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.