Literature DB >> 16220739

Trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990-2003.

Fay Menacker1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This report presents trends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women, in relation to the Healthy People 2010 (HP 2010) objectives. Data for the U.S. showing trends by maternal age and race and Hispanic origin are presented.
METHODS: Cesarean rates were computed based on the information reported on birth certificates.
RESULTS: With a decrease between 1990 and 1996 and an increase between 1996 and 2003, the trend in the cesarean rate for low-risk women having a first birth paralleled trends in the primary (regardless of parity) and total cesarean rates. During 1996-2003 the cesarean rate for low-risk women having a first birth has consistently been at least 13 percent lower than the rate for all women having a first birth. For 2003 the cesarean rate for all primiparous women was 27.1 percent; for low-risk women the rate was 23.6 percent. The trend in the repeat cesarean rate for low-risk women was similar to the trend in the repeat rate for all women, i.e., a decrease from 1990 to 1996 and an increase from 1996 to 2003. The repeat cesarean rate for low-risk women has consistently been slightly lower than the rate for all women. For 2003 the repeat rate for all women was 89.4; the rate for low-risk women was 88.7. These trends were found for low-risk women of all ages and racial or ethnic groups. Therefore, low-risk women giving birth for the first time who have a cesarean delivery are more likely to have a subsequent cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16220739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep        ISSN: 1551-8922


  20 in total

1.  Position paper: promoting, supporting, and protecting normal birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

2.  Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Sayeedha F G Uddin; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

3.  Patient-Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population-Based Survey of U.S. Women.

Authors:  Judy Jou; Katy B Kozhimannil; Pamela Jo Johnson; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Attitudes of Obstetricians toward Cesarean Delivery in Challenging Cases.

Authors:  Sareh Samadi; Naeimeh Gholizadeh; Nasrin Shoar; Saeed Shoar
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-05-15

5.  Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.

Authors:  Cande V Ananth; Alexander M Friedman; Katherine M Keyes; Jessica A Lavery; Ava Hamilton; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Relationship between mode of delivery in childbirth and prevalence of allergic diseases in Korean children.

Authors:  Yeo Hoon Park; Kyung Won Kim; Bong Seok Choi; Hye Mi Jee; Myung Hyun Sohn; Kyu-Earn Kim
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 5.764

8.  Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Stephen A Contag; Rebecca G Clifton; Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan M Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Birth by cesarean section, allergic rhinitis, and allergic sensitization among children with a parental history of atopy.

Authors:  Michael Pistiner; Diane R Gold; Hassen Abdulkerim; Elaine Hoffman; Juan C Celedón
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 10.793

10.  How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC?

Authors:  Torri D Metz; Gregory J Stoddard; Erick Henry; Marc Jackson; Calla Holmgren; Sean Esplin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.