Literature DB >> 24431663

Attitudes of Obstetricians toward Cesarean Delivery in Challenging Cases.

Sareh Samadi1, Naeimeh Gholizadeh1, Nasrin Shoar2, Saeed Shoar3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the behavior and preferred delivery method among Iranian obstetricians in challenging cases.
METHOD: Using the revised Jackson personality inventory questionnaire, the attitudes of obstetricians toward cesarean delivery were assessed in challenging childbirth cases. The study was conducted at the Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in Mashhad, Iran. RESULT: Seventy-five obstetricians answered each item reflecting varying levels of preference and risk attitudes. However, a significant number of respondents avoided the risk of requesting a cesarean because of legislation and legal issues.
CONCLUSION: Iranian obstetricians prefer low-risk behavior for managing ambiguous delivery cases. Fear of legislation and medicolegal issues appear to be of great importance in this cohort primarily comprising female physicians.

Keywords:  Ambiguous cases; Cesarean delivery; Risk attitude

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431663      PMCID: PMC3798444          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-013-0401-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  25 in total

1.  Maternal request for cesarean section due to fear of birth: can it be changed through crisis-oriented counseling?

Authors:  Hilde Nerum; Lotta Halvorsen; Tore Sørlie; Pål Oian
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Change in cesarean section rate as a reflection of the present malpractice crisis.

Authors:  Kristi Ryan; Peter Schnatz; John Greene; Stephen Curry
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  2005-03

3.  Professional liability claims and Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists members: myth versus reality.

Authors:  Suneet P Chauhan; Vidya B Chauhan; Bryan D Cowan; Nancy W Hendrix; Everett F Magann; John C Morrison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Maternal risk profiles and the primary cesarean rate in the United States, 1991-2002.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Fay Menacker; Marian Macdorman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Why obstetrics/gynecology, and what if it were not an option? A survey of resident applicants.

Authors:  Tony Ogburn; Eve Espey; Amy Autry; Larry Leeman; Sally Bachofer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Susan R Miesnik; Barbara J Reale
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  Overview of professional liability.

Authors:  Judith L Chervenak
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.430

8.  Obstetricians' choice of cesarean delivery in ambiguous cases: is it influenced by risk attitude or fear of complaints and litigation?

Authors:  Dorthe Fuglenes; Pål Oian; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed.

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-15

10.  Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians' attitudes in eight European countries.

Authors:  M Habiba; M Kaminski; M Da Frè; K Marsal; O Bleker; J Librero; H Grandjean; P Gratia; S Guaschino; W Heyl; D Taylor; M Cuttini
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  Decision-making during trial of labour after caesarean; a qualitative study with gynaecologists.

Authors:  Anna L Rietveld; Christianne J M de Groot; Pim W Teunissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Clinicians' views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies.

Authors:  Sunita Panda; Cecily Begley; Deirdre Daly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.