Literature DB >> 22991012

Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Sayeedha F G Uddin1, Alan E Simon.   

Abstract

This study compares rates of trial of labor after Cesarean delivery (TOLAC) and rates of successful TOLAC between 1990 and 2009. Serial cross-sectional analyses were performed using the National Hospital Discharge Survey data to compare rates of TOLAC and TOLAC success between 1990 and 2009. Joinpoint regression was used to assess trends over time, and logistic regression with marginal effects was used to examine the unadjusted and adjusted significance and magnitude of trends. The rate of TOLAC reached a high of 51.8 % (95 % CI 47.8-55.8 %) in 1995 and a low of 15.9 % (95 % CI 13.8-18.0 %) in 2006, declined, on average, 4.2 (95 % CI -4.8 to -3.9) percentage points per year between 1996 and 2005. Rates increased significantly from 1990 to 1996 and 2005 to 2009. TOLAC success was at its highest rate in 2000, 69.8 % (95 % CI 65.2-74.3 %) and its lowest in 2008, 38.5 % (95 % CI 28.1-48.8 %). The rate of TOLAC success increased significantly between 1990 and 2000, but declined thereafter an average of 3.4 % points per year (95 % CI -4.3 to -2.5). The rate of TOLAC in the US decreased between 1996 and 2005 and the rate of successful TOLAC has declined from 2000 to 2009.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22991012     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-012-1132-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  34 in total

1.  Maternal and neonatal morbidity after elective repeat Cesarean delivery versus a trial of labor after previous Cesarean delivery in a community teaching hospital.

Authors:  G Loebel; C M Zelop; J F X Egan; J Wax
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2004-04

2.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Use and in-hospital mortality associated with two cardiac procedures, by sex and age: national trends, 1990-2004.

Authors:  Julia S Holmes; Lola Jean Kozak; Maria F Owings
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section.

Authors:  M J McMahon; E R Luther; W A Bowes; A F Olshan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rate.

Authors:  J M Bais; D M van der Borden; M Pel; G J Bonsel; M Eskes; H J van der Slikke; O P Bleker
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Is vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) or elective repeat cesarean safer in women with a prior vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; David M Stamilio; Anthony O Odibo; Jeffrey F Peipert; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Erika J Stevens; Mary D Sammel; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery.

Authors:  T F Nielsen; U Ljungblad; H Hagberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome.

Authors:  Kimberly D Gregory; Lisa M Korst; Moshe Fridman; Ida Shihady; Paula Broussard; Arlene Fink; Linda Burnes Bolton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Risk of uterine rupture in labor induction of patients with prior cesarean section: an inner city hospital experience.

Authors:  Carol Lin; B Denise Raynor
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Association between Hospital Frequency of Labor after Cesarean and Outcomes in California.

Authors:  Mekhala V Dissanayake; Marit L Bovbjerg; Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-08-25

2.  Uterine rupture risk in a trial of labor after cesarean section with and without previous vaginal births.

Authors:  Avraham Nahum-Yerushalmy; Asnat Walfisch; Michal Lipschuetz; Joshua I Rosenbloom; Doron Kabiri; Hila Hochler
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success.

Authors:  Adam Korrick Lewkowitz; Sanae Nakagawa; Mari-Paule Thiet; Melissa Greer Rosenstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean birth by provider type in low-risk women.

Authors:  Matthew S Fore; Amanda A Allshouse; Nicole S Carlson; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Trial of labour after caesarean section and the risk of neonatal and infant death: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Sinéad M O'Neill; Esben Agerbo; Ali S Khashan; Patricia M Kearney; Tine Brink Henriksen; Richard A Greene; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Questionnaire survey on women's views after a first caesarean delivery in two tertiary centres in Ireland and their preference for involvement in a future randomised trial on mode of birth.

Authors:  Gillian Ryan; Kate C O Doherty; Declan Devane; Fionnuala McAuliffe; John Morrison
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Cesarean section rates in Brazil: Trend analysis using the Robson classification system.

Authors:  Edson Luciano Rudey; Maria do Carmo Leal; Guilhermina Rego
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.