Literature DB >> 20099218

Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery.

Stephen A Contag1, Rebecca G Clifton, Steven L Bloom, Catherine Y Spong, Michael W Varner, Dwight J Rouse, Susan M Ramin, Steve N Caritis, Alan M Peaceman, Yoram Sorokin, Anthony Sciscione, Marshall W Carpenter, Brian M Mercer, John M Thorp, Fergal D Malone, Jay D Iams.   

Abstract

We compared outcomes for neonates with forceps-assisted, vacuum-assisted, or cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized trial in laboring, low-risk, nulliparous women at >or=36 weeks' gestation. Neonatal outcomes after use of forceps, vacuum, and cesarean were compared among women in the second stage of labor at station +1 or below (thirds scale) for failure of descent or nonreassuring fetal status. Nine hundred ninety women were included in this analysis: 549 (55%) with an indication for delivery of failure of descent and 441 (45%) for a nonreassuring fetal status. Umbilical cord gases were available for 87% of neonates. We found no differences in the base excess (P = 0.35 and 0.78 for failure of descent and nonreassuring fetal status) or frequencies of pH below 7.0 (P = 0.73 and 0.34 for failure of descent and nonreassuring fetal status) among the three delivery methods. Birth outcomes and umbilical cord blood gas values were similar for those neonates with a forceps-assisted, vacuum-assisted, or cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor. The occurrence of significant fetal acidemia was not different among the three delivery methods regardless of the indication. Thieme Medical Publishers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20099218      PMCID: PMC6122599          DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.

Authors:  S W Wen; S Liu; M S Kramer; S Marcoux; A Ohlsson; R Sauvé; R Liston
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Diagnosis of birth asphyxia on the basis of fetal pH, Apgar score, and newborn cerebral dysfunction.

Authors:  L C Gilstrap; K J Leveno; J Burris; M L Williams; B B Little
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Perinatal outcome in relation to second-stage duration.

Authors:  S M Menticoglou; F Manning; C Harman; I Morrison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.

Authors:  James M Alexander; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Mark B Landon; Sharon Gilbert; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Authors:  Joel D Larma; Anadir M Silva; Cynthia J Holcroft; Richard E Thompson; Pamela K Donohue; Ernest M Graham
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  A systematic review of the role of intrapartum hypoxia-ischemia in the causation of neonatal encephalopathy.

Authors:  Ernest M Graham; Kristy A Ruis; Adam L Hartman; Frances J Northington; Harold E Fox
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Operative vaginal delivery and neonatal and infant adverse outcomes: population based retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kitaw Demissie; George G Rhoads; John C Smulian; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Kishor Gandhi; K S Joseph; Michael Kramer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

8.  Pathologic fetal acidemia.

Authors:  K G Goldaber; L C Gilstrap; K J Leveno; J S Dax; D D McIntire
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Can formal education and training improve the outcome of instrumental delivery?

Authors:  Y C Cheong; H Abdullahi; H Lashen; F M Fairlie
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 10.  Is cerebral palsy preventable?

Authors:  Karin B Nelson; Taeun Chang
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.710

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Vacuum extraction vaginal delivery: current trend and safety.

Authors:  Jihan Jeon; Sunghun Na
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-23

2.  Trial of labor after cesarean: attempted operative vaginal delivery versus emergency repeat cesarean, a prospective national cohort study.

Authors:  A L Rietveld; N Kok; B M Kazemier; C J M de Groot; P W Teunissen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.521

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.