Literature DB >> 16191608

Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape.

Bernhard Fink1, Karl Grammer, Philipp Mitteroecker, Philipp Gunz, Katrin Schaefer, Fred L Bookstein, John T Manning.   

Abstract

The average human male face differs from the average female face in size and shape of the jaws, cheek-bones, lips, eyes and nose. It is possible that this dimorphism is determined by sex steroids such as testosterone (T) and oestrogen (E), and several studies on the perception of such characteristics have been based on this assumption, but those studies focussed mainly on the relationship of male faces with circulating hormone levels; the corresponding biology of the female face remains mainly speculative. This paper is concerned with the relative importance of prenatal T and E levels (assessed via the 2D : 4D finger length ratio, a proxy for the ratio of T/E) and sex in the determination of facial form as characterized by 64 landmark points on facial photographs of 106 Austrians of college age. We found that (i) prenatal sex steroid ratios (in terms of 2D : 4D) and actual chromosomal sex dimorphism operate differently on faces, (ii) 2D : 4D affects male and female face shape by similar patterns, but (iii) is three times more intense in men than in women. There was no evidence that these effects were confounded by allometry or facial asymmetry. Our results suggest that studies on the perception of facial characteristics need to consider differential effects of prenatal hormone exposure and actual chromosomal gender in order to understand how characteristics have come to be rated 'masculine' or 'feminine' and the consequences of these perceptions in terms of mate preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16191608      PMCID: PMC1559906          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  24 in total

1.  Facial attractiveness.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Bias and error in estimates of mean shape in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  F James Rohlf
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population.

Authors:  E Bulygina; P Mitteroecker; L Aiello
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 5.  Testosterone and dominance in men.

Authors:  A Mazur; A Booth
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness.

Authors:  M R Cunningham; A P Barbee; C L Pike
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-07

7.  Effect of low-dose testosterone treatment on craniofacial growth in boys with delayed puberty.

Authors:  A Verdonck; M Gaethofs; C Carels; F de Zegher
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The 2nd:4th digit ratio and asymmetry of hand performance in Jamaican children.

Authors:  J T Manning; R L Trivers; R Thornhill; D Singh
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  2000-04

9.  Craniofacial sexual dimorphism patterns and allometry among extant hominids.

Authors:  Katrin Schaefer; Philipp Mitteroecker; Philipp Gunz; Markus Bernhard; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  Ann Anat       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males.

Authors:  John P Swaddle; Gillian W Reierson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  36 in total

1.  Soft-tissue facial characteristics of attractive Chinese men compared to normal men.

Authors:  Feng Wu; Junfang Li; Hong He; Na Huang; Youchao Tang; Yuanqing Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

2.  Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones; Anthony C Little; Lynda G Boothroyd; David I Perrett; Ian S Penton-Voak; Philip A Cooper; Lars Penke; David R Feinberg; Bernard P Tiddeman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Avian hind-limb digit length ratios measured from radiographs are sexually dimorphic.

Authors:  Barbara Leoni; Diego Rubolini; Maria Romano; Mauro di Giancamillo; Nicola Saino
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Secular change of sexually dimorphic cranial variables in Euro-Americans and Germans.

Authors:  Laura Manthey; Richard L Jantz; Michael Bohnert; Katharina Jellinghaus
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Face to Face : The Perception of Automotive Designs.

Authors:  Sonja Windhager; Dennis E Slice; Katrin Schaefer; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Truls Thorstensen; Karl Grammer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2008-12

6.  Prenatal sex hormones, digit ratio, and face shape in adult males.

Authors:  S M Weinberg; T E Parsons; Z D Raffensperger; M L Marazita
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in boys: the lower the digit ratio, the more robust the face.

Authors:  Konstanze Meindl; Sonja Windhager; Bernard Wallner; Katrin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Face Shape and Behavior: Implications of Similarities in Infants and Adults.

Authors:  Leslie A Zebrowitz; Robert G Franklin; Jasmine Boshyan
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  Prenatal testosterone exposure is related to sexually dimorphic facial morphology in adulthood.

Authors:  Andrew J O Whitehouse; Syed Zulqarnain Gilani; Faisal Shafait; Ajmal Mian; Diana Weiting Tan; Murray T Maybery; Jeffrey A Keelan; Roger Hart; David J Handelsman; Mithran Goonawardene; Peter Eastwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Spatially dense morphometrics of craniofacial sexual dimorphism in 1-year-olds.

Authors:  Harold Matthews; Tony Penington; Ine Saey; Jane Halliday; Evelyn Muggli; Peter Claes
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.