Literature DB >> 8713662

Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis.

F L Bookstein1.   

Abstract

At the core of contemporary morphometrics--the quantitative study of biological shape variation--is a synthesis of two originally divergent methodological styles. One contributory tradition is the multivariate analysis of covariance matrices originally developed as biometrics and now dominant across a broad expanse of applied statistics. This approach, couched solely in the linear geometry of covariance structures, ignores biomathematical aspects of the original measurements. The other tributary emphasizes the direct visualization of changes in biological form. However, making objective the biological meaning of the features seen in those diagrams was always problematical; also, the representation of variation, as distinct from pairwise difference, proved infeasible. To combine these two variants of biomathematical modeling into a valid praxis for quantitative studies of biological shape was a goal earnestly sought though most of this century. That goal was finally achieved in the 1980s when techniques from mathematical statistics, multivariate biometrics, non-Euclidean geometry and computer graphics were combined in a coherent new system of tools for the complete regionalized quantitative analysis of landmark points together with the biomedical images in which they are seen. In this morphometric synthesis, correspondence of landmarks (biologically labeled geometric points, like "bridge of the nose") across specimens is taken as a biomathematical primitive. The shapes of configurations of landmarks are defined as equivalence classes with respect to the Euclidean similarity group and then represented as single points in David Kendall's shape space, a Riemannian manifold with Procrustes distance as metric. All conventional multivariate strategies carry over to the study of shape variation and covariation when shapes are interpreted in the tangent space to the shape manifold at an average shape. For biomathematical interpretation of such analyses, one needs a basis for the tangent space compatible with the reality of local biotheoretical processes and explanations at many different geometric scales, and one needs graphics for visualizing average shape differences and other statistical contrasts there. Both of these needs are managed by the thin-plate spline, a deformation function that has an unusually helpful linear algebra. The spline also links the biometrics of landmarks to deformation analysis of the images from which the landmarks originally arose. This article reviews the history and principal tools of this synthesis in their biomathematical and biometrical context and demonstrates their usefulness in a study of focal neuroanatomical anomalies in schizophrenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8713662     DOI: 10.1007/BF02458311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Math Biol        ISSN: 0092-8240            Impact factor:   1.758


  6 in total

1.  A nonhomogeneous anthropometric scaling method based on finite element principles.

Authors:  J L Lewis; W D Lew; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  On the cephalometrics of skeletal change.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1982-09

3.  A statistical method for biological shape comparisons.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1984-04-07       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Tensor biometrics for changes in cranial shape.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.533

5.  Thalamic abnormalities in schizophrenia visualized through magnetic resonance image averaging.

Authors:  N C Andreasen; S Arndt; V Swayze; T Cizadlo; M Flaum; D O'Leary; J C Ehrhardt; W T Yuh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Spatial relationships of neuroanatomic landmarks in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J R DeQuardo; F L Bookstein; W D Green; J A Brunberg; R Tandon
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 3.222

  6 in total
  43 in total

1.  Creation and use of a Talairach-compatible atlas for accurate, automated, nonlinear intersubject registration, and analysis of functional imaging data.

Authors:  R P Woods; M Dapretto; N L Sicotte; A W Toga; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Analysis of Hyoid-Larynx Complex Using 3D Geometric Morphometrics.

Authors:  Anthony Loth; Julien Corny; Laure Santini; Laurie Dahan; Patrick Dessi; Pascal Adalian; Nicolas Fakhry
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation.

Authors:  S Ivan Perez; Valeria Bernal; Paula N Gonzalez
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Combining anatomical manifold information via diffeomorphic metric mappings for studying cortical thinning of the cingulate gyrus in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anqi Qiu; Laurent Younes; Lei Wang; J Tilak Ratnanather; Sarah K Gillepsie; Gillian Kaplan; John Csernansky; Michael I Miller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Limitations of traditional morphometrics in research on the attractiveness of faces.

Authors:  Erik Holland
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-06

6.  Cultural universals: measuring the semantic structure of emotion terms in English and Japanese.

Authors:  A K Romney; C C Moore; C D Rusch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  C P Klingenberg; L J Leamy; E J Routman; J M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Detecting corpus callosum abnormalities in autism based on anatomical landmarks.

Authors:  Qing He; Ye Duan; Kevin Karsch; Judith Miles
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.222

9.  Correlated evolution of personality, morphology and performance.

Authors:  Elizabeth M A Kern; Detric Robinson; Erika Gass; John Godwin; R Brian Langerhans
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Morphometric integration and modularity in configurations of landmarks: tools for evaluating a priori hypotheses.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.930

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.