S M Weinberg1, T E Parsons, Z D Raffensperger, M L Marazita. 1. Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, Department of Oral Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Anthropology, Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Several reports have demonstrated a relationship between second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) and facial shape, suggesting that prenatal sex hormones play a role in the development of the craniofacial complex. Using 3D surface imaging and geometric morphometrics, we test the hypothesis that decreased digit ratio (indicative of increased prenatal androgen exposure) is associated with a more masculine facial phenotype. METHODS: 3D facial surface images and digit measures were collected on a sample of 151 adult males. Facial landmarks collected from the images were aligned by Procrustes superimposition and the resulting shape coordinates regressed on 2D:4D. Variations in facial shape related to 2D:4D were visualized with deformable surface warps. RESULTS: A significant statistical relationship was observed between facial shape variation and 2D:4D (p = 0.0084). Lower 2D:4D ratio in adult males was associated with increased facial width relative to height, increased mandibular prognathism, greater nasal projection, and increased upper and lower lip projection. CONCLUSIONS: A statistical relationship between 2D:4D and facial shape in adult males was observed. Faces tended to look more masculine as 2D:4D decreased, suggesting a biologically plausible link between prenatal androgen exposure and the development of male facial characteristics.
OBJECTIVES: Several reports have demonstrated a relationship between second to fourth digit ratio (2D:4D) and facial shape, suggesting that prenatal sex hormones play a role in the development of the craniofacial complex. Using 3D surface imaging and geometric morphometrics, we test the hypothesis that decreased digit ratio (indicative of increased prenatal androgen exposure) is associated with a more masculine facial phenotype. METHODS: 3D facial surface images and digit measures were collected on a sample of 151 adult males. Facial landmarks collected from the images were aligned by Procrustes superimposition and the resulting shape coordinates regressed on 2D:4D. Variations in facial shape related to 2D:4D were visualized with deformable surface warps. RESULTS: A significant statistical relationship was observed between facial shape variation and 2D:4D (p = 0.0084). Lower 2D:4D ratio in adult males was associated with increased facial width relative to height, increased mandibular prognathism, greater nasal projection, and increased upper and lower lip projection. CONCLUSIONS: A statistical relationship between 2D:4D and facial shape in adult males was observed. Faces tended to look more masculine as 2D:4D decreased, suggesting a biologically plausible link between prenatal androgen exposure and the development of male facial characteristics.
Authors: Seth M Weinberg; Sybill Naidoo; Daniel P Govier; Rick A Martin; Alex A Kane; Mary L Marazita Journal: J Craniofac Surg Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 1.046
Authors: Bernhard Fink; Karl Grammer; Philipp Mitteroecker; Philipp Gunz; Katrin Schaefer; Fred L Bookstein; John T Manning Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2005-10-07 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Matthew J Kesterke; Margaret A Judd; Mark P Mooney; Michael I Siegel; Mohammed Elsalanty; R Nicole Howie; Seth M Weinberg; James J Cray Journal: J Anat Date: 2018-04-02 Impact factor: 2.610
Authors: Seth M Weinberg; Zachary D Raffensperger; Matthew J Kesterke; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Jeffrey C Murray; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno; Mary L Marazita Journal: Cleft Palate Craniofac J Date: 2015-10-22
Authors: Jasmien Roosenboom; Karlijne Indencleef; Myoung Keun Lee; Hanne Hoskens; Julie D White; Dongjing Liu; Jacqueline T Hecht; George L Wehby; Lina M Moreno; Carolyn Hodges-Simeon; Eleanor Feingold; Mary L Marazita; Stephen Richmond; Mark D Shriver; Peter Claes; John R Shaffer; Seth M Weinberg Journal: Front Genet Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthew J Kesterke; Zachary D Raffensperger; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Nichole L Nidey; Lina M Moreno; George L Wehby; Mary L Marazita; Seth M Weinberg Journal: Biol Sex Differ Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 5.027
Authors: Harold S Matthews; Anthony J Penington; Rita Hardiman; Yi Fan; John G Clement; Nicola M Kilpatrick; Peter D Claes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Wael AbdAlmageed; Hengameh Mirzaalian; Xiao Guo; Linda M Randolph; Veeraya K Tanawattanacharoen; Mitchell E Geffner; Heather M Ross; Mimi S Kim Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-11-02