Literature DB >> 26217067

Face Shape and Behavior: Implications of Similarities in Infants and Adults.

Leslie A Zebrowitz1, Robert G Franklin2, Jasmine Boshyan1.   

Abstract

We investigated conceptual overlap between literature demonstrating links between adult facial width-to-height ratio (FWHR) and behavior and that demonstrating links between infant FWHR and temperament by investigating whether babyfaceness is associated with FWHR and behavior at both ages. Babyfaceness was positively correlated with FWHR in both infants and adults. Babyfaceness also was correlated with an infant temperament that is a precursor of bolder behavior in childhood and adulthood, just as a broader infant FWHR was previously shown to be. These results call into question existing explanations for relationships between facial appearance and adult assertive or aggressive behavior. Previously, behavioral correlates of adult FWHR have been attributed to influences of pubertal testosterone, and correlates of adult babyfaceness have been attributed to compensation for undesirable stereotypes. Our findings indicate that the pre-natal developmental influences required to explain appearance-temperament relationships in infancy also should be considered as explanations for appearance-behavior relationships in adulthood.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Face-width-height ratio; assertive/aggressive behavior; babyface; prenatal influences

Year:  2015        PMID: 26217067      PMCID: PMC4513367          DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Individ Dif        ISSN: 0191-8869


  26 in total

1.  A face only an investor could love: CEOs' facial structure predicts their firms' financial performance.

Authors:  Elaine M Wong; Margaret E Ormiston; Michael P Haselhuhn
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-10-31

2.  Bad to the bone: facial structure predicts unethical behaviour.

Authors:  Michael P Haselhuhn; Elaine M Wong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.

Authors:  Carmen E Lefevre; Peter J Etchells; Emma C Howell; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  Testosterone and dominance in men.

Authors:  A Mazur; A Booth
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Biological bases of childhood shyness.

Authors:  J Kagan; J S Reznick; N Snidman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-04-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Adolescent social anxiety as an outcome of inhibited temperament in childhood.

Authors:  C E Schwartz; N Snidman; J Kagan
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.829

7.  Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression.

Authors:  Stefan M M Goetz; Kraig S Shattuck; Robert M Miller; Jocelyn A Campbell; Elianna Lozoya; Glenn E Weisfeld; Justin M Carré
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25

8.  Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior.

Authors:  Justin M Carré; Cheryl M McCormick; Catherine J Mondloch
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-08-14

9.  A phenotype of early infancy predicts reactivity of the amygdala in male adults.

Authors:  C E Schwartz; P S Kunwar; D N Greve; J Kagan; N C Snidman; R B Bloch
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Biometric evidence that sexual selection has shaped the hominin face.

Authors:  Eleanor M Weston; Adrian E Friday; Pietro Liò
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  What's in the Chinese Babyface? Cultural Differences in Understanding the Babyface.

Authors:  Wenwen Zheng; Qian Yang; Kaiping Peng; Feng Yu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-31

2.  Response: Commentary: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N H Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-19

3.  Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Graham Albert; George B Richardson; Timothy S McHale; Seth M Weinberg; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Facial Width-To-Height Ratio (fWHR) Is Not Associated with Adolescent Testosterone Levels.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hodges-Simeon; Katherine N Hanson Sobraske; Theodore Samore; Michael Gurven; Steven J C Gaulin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Glued to Which Face? Attentional Priority Effect of Female Babyface and Male Mature Face.

Authors:  Wenwen Zheng; Ting Luo; Chuan-Peng Hu; Kaiping Peng
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  The importance of first impression judgements in interspecies interactions.

Authors:  Laura Clark; Kevin Butler; Kay L Ritchie; Laëtitia Maréchal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.