Literature DB >> 16189324

Metal-specific differences in levels of DNA damage caused by synovial fluid recovered at revision arthroplasty.

A P Davies1, A Sood, A C Lewis, R Newson, I D Learmonth, C P Case.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown an increase in chromosomal aberrations in patients with worn implants. The type of aberration depended on the type of metal alloy in the prosthesis. We have investigated the metal-specific difference in the level of DNA damage (DNA stand breaks and alkali labile sites) induced by culturing human fibroblasts in synovial fluid retrieved at revision arthroplasty. All six samples from revision cobalt-chromium metal-on-metal and four of six samples from cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene prostheses caused DNA damage. By contrast, none of six samples from revision stainless-steel metal-on-polyethylene prostheses caused significant damage. Samples of cobalt-chromium alloy left to corrode in phosphate-buffered saline also caused DNA damage and this depended on a synergistic effect between the cobalt and chromium ions. Our results further emphasise that epidemiological studies of orthopaedic implants should take account of the type of metal alloy used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16189324     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  14 in total

1.  Surgical variables influence metal ion levels after hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Nicholas M Desy; Stephane G Bergeron; Alain Petit; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Trace metal analysis following locked volar plating for unstable fractures of the distal radius.

Authors:  Lucas S Rylander; Joseph C Milbrandt; Evan Armington; Marty Wilson; David J Olysav
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 3.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Douis; D J Dunlop; A M Pearson; J N O'Hara; S L J James
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Differences in concentration of metal debris in blood, serum, and plasma samples of patients with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Khan; J H Kuiper; Christine Sieniawska; J B Richardson
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-09

5.  Femoral head size does not affect ion values in metal-on-metal total hips.

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Alan Walsh; Alain Petit; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Long-term follow-up and metal ion trend of patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mitchell Bernstein; Nicholas M Desy; Alain Petit; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Cancer risk is not increased after conventional hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tuomo Visuri; Pekka Pulkkinen; Pekka Paavolainen; Eero Pukkala
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA?

Authors:  Nick Bayley; Habeeb Khan; Paul Grosso; Thomas Hupel; David Stevens; Matthew Snider; Emil Schemitsch; Paul Kuzyk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old.

Authors:  R Nizard; D Pourreyron; A Raould; D Hannouche; L Sedel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Effects of metal-on-metal wear on the host immune system and infection in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anton H Hosman; Henny C van der Mei; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Henk J Busscher; Danielle Neut
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.