Literature DB >> 1618709

The human frequency-following response (FFR): normal variability and relation to the click-evoked brainstem response.

J Hoormann1, M Falkenstein, J Hohnsbein, L Blanke.   

Abstract

The frequency-following response (FFR) was recorded from twenty human subjects (11 female and 9 male) over a frequency range of 128-832 Hz in order to study the normal variability of this evoked potential and its dependence on age and sex. Moreover the relation of the FFR to the click-evoked brain stem response (BER) was analyzed in order to contribute to the FFR source discussion. The FFR had a maximum amplitude of about 400 nV and a latency of about 6.4 ms for stimulus frequencies around 350 Hz; the inter-individual variance of the best frequency and of the shape of the frequency function was considerable. Large second harmonics were seen in the FFR to stimuli below about 200 Hz. The FFR amplitude tended to be larger in younger subjects, whereas no such effect was found for the BER. No significant sex effect was found for the FFR amplitude, whereas the BER waves IV and VI were larger for females than for males. There were no correlations between FFR and BER latencies. Significant correlations were found between the amplitudes of the FFR and BER components II, III and IV, but not of waves V and VI. The results support the notion that the FFR and the BER reflect different mechanisms. Moreover the results do not favor the common hypothesis that the inferior colliculus is the major source of the scalp-recorded human FFR, but rather point to lower brainstem levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618709     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90114-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  24 in total

1.  Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Todd M Freeberg; Glenis R Long; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Mikko Sams; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Brainstem transcription of speech is disrupted in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Trent Nicol; Barbara Trommer; Steve Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-07

4.  Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Dana Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Stimulus rate and subcortical auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  Jennifer L Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Changes in pitch height elicit both language-universal and language-dependent changes in neural representation of pitch in the brainstem and auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Krista L Johnson; Trent Nicol; Steven G Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: neural origins and plasticity.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.