Literature DB >> 1618626

Evaluation of the Health Belief Model and decision making regarding amniocentesis in women of advanced maternal age.

B N French1, T W Kurczynski, M T Weaver, M J Pituch.   

Abstract

The Health Belief Model (HBM) was developed as an attempt to explain an individual's decision regarding obtaining preventive health care. This model was applied to predict the decisions of women of advanced maternal age regarding their obtaining amniocentesis in a one-year study conducted in Toledo, Ohio. A questionnaire based on the HBM was administered to a sample of 98 pregnant women of advanced maternal age. A total of 96 questionnaires were eligible for inclusion in the study. Sixty-one women reported that they would have amniocentesis, 22 would not, and 13 were unsure. A multivariate analysis of variance among amniocentesis decision groups was performed using the health belief components (perceived susceptibility, perceived seriousness, perceived benefit, perceived barrier) and knowledge as variables. There was a significant difference (Wilks' criterion, p less than .0001) among the three decision groups, but the differences were in the health belief components and not in knowledge. A stepwise discriminant function analysis was used to classify subjects on the amniocentesis decision. Of the variables examined, only the HBM component perceived benefit factor was a significant discriminant (p = .0001). It is not necessarily the lack of knowledge that prevents women who are at risk because of advanced maternal age from having amniocentesis but their perceptions regarding amniocentesis. Genetic counselors need to focus more on exploring the perceptions of amniocentesis benefits in this population to facilitate the decision making process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1618626     DOI: 10.1177/109019819201900203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Q        ISSN: 0195-8402


  7 in total

1.  Invasive prenatal testing decisions in pregnancy after infertility.

Authors:  Colleen Caleshu; Shoshana Shiloh; Cristofer Price; Julie Sapp; Barbara Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 2.  Maternal decisions regarding prenatal diagnosis: rational choices or sensible decisions?

Authors:  Karen L Lawson; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2007-03

3.  Correlates of genetic counseling and testing among Orthodox Jews.

Authors:  Shulamis Juni Pollak
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2009-08-11

4.  Racial-ethnic differences in genetic amniocentesis uptake.

Authors:  Jennifer B Saucier; Dennis Johnston; Catherine A Wicklund; Patricia Robbins-Furman; Jacqueline T Hecht; Manju Monga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Elective amniocentesis in low-risk pregnancies: decision making in the era of information and uncertainty.

Authors:  Y Lesser; J Rabinowitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Factors that affect the decision to undergo amniocentesis in women with normal Down syndrome screening results: it is all about the age.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Liat Ries-Levavi; Elon Pras
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  The limited effect of information on Israeli pregnant women at advanced maternal age who decide to undergo amniocentesis.

Authors:  Julia Grinshpun-Cohen; Talya Miron-Shatz; Michal Berkenstet; Elon Pras
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-08-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.